Answer:
don't no<em><u> </u></em><em><u>for</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>the</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>answer</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>he</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>app</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>vapru</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>naga</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>he</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>app</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>bakwas</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>ahe</u></em>
X-25 < 100
x minus the $25 discount has to be less than 100
Answer:
The line passing through the points (2, -14) and (4, -24)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The data provide sufficient evidence that older people are more likely to be victimized.
Step-by-step explanation:
H 0 : P = 0.10
H 1 : P > 0.10 (Right tailed test)
n = 527, P = 0.1235
The test statistics
x = P - p / 
x = 0.1235 - 0.10 / 
x = 0.0235 / 
x = 0.0235 / 
x = 0.0235 / 0.0130682049264618
x = 1.798257689731729
x = 1.798
P value = [1 - p(Z > 1.7980] (Right tailed test)
P value = 0.036089
The P - Value is very small, so <u>reject H0</u>
Conclusion: The data provide sufficient evidence that older people are more likely to be victimized.