it creates a feeling is suspense as it’s alluding to the actual problem
This link is fake I tried to look it up and it said it was fake so don’t waste your time looking it up.
<span>1.
</span>The main argument in this essay is that if the
audience does not accept the villain the poet (specifically Shakespeare here) writes,
then Shakespeare will become the villain of his own play.
<span>2.
</span>In lines 25-44 the author is supporting the
fact that the poet is completely at the mercy of his audience. Sometimes the
reception by the audience has nothing to do with the play itself, it might be
differences from audience to audience based on who is there and how they are
feeling on that particular night.
<span>
3. Shakespeare cannot give up revenge because it is what the audience wants.
The author says that “tragedy is revenge”. If he gives up revenge, he is giving
up his audience and therefore his entire basis of work. </span>
<span>
4. The author presents this information directly from the text because the
structure of the lines is as important as what they are saying. Hamlet presents
the images of his father and his uncle next to each other, and the meter of the
lines represents that back and forth of comparison by mirroring each other. “This
was your husband/Here is your husband”. The repetition with slight changes in
description show the contrast better than a summary could. </span>
<span>
5. The author says this is a “catchy example” because Hamlet needs to adopt the
same sense of grand military action towards Claudius for his revenge as Fortinbras
does for what seems like nothing. Hamlet needs, like Fortinbras, to be willing
to throw away everything for “an eggshell”. </span>
<span>
6. Laertes is like the actor that played Hecuba because he is able to turn on
his tears and emotions even if it contradicts what he is feeling inside. This similarity
suggests that Laertes cares more about the show of things, in the same way he
seems to care more about the ceremony surrounding Ophelia’s burial than her death
itself, than the things themselves. It shows that he is all for show rather
than sincerity. </span>
<span>
7. These lines relate to the author’s argument because it reinforces the idea
that the audience is actually in control of the play. It shows examples of
lines that represent the height of the trauma and tragedy, so that the audience
knows the ending is near. </span>
<span>
8. Gertrude refers to Hamlet’s outburst as “madness” and he refers to his own
outburst as “towering passion.” The differences here are in who the audience
chooses to believe. If the audience follows Gertrude’s lead by thinking he is
mad, they will receive the ending differently than if they trust Hamlet himself
that his outbursts are an outpouring of passion. </span>
Answer:
I think it's scanning
Explanation: I hope you have/had an amazing day<3
The monster has a strong relationship with Conor's denial of what is happening around him. Conor refuses to believe that his mother is dying and that makes him behave in an aggressive and devastating way, tiring for him and for everyone. This denial establishes not only the connection between Conor and the monster, but it also establishes the monster's ability to help Conor understand his feelings about everything that is happening. The connection between them allows the monster to show how complex human feelings are and that Conor, as a child, must allow himself to feel, suffer and overcome them.