Carlos is correct
Since we don't know the length of sides PR and XZ, the triangles can't be congruent by the SSS theorem or the SAS theorem, and since we don't know the measure of angles Y and Q, the triangles can't be congruent by the ASA theorem, the SAS theorem or the AAS theorem. Therefore, Carlos is correct.
Carlos is correct. Since the angles P and X are not included between PQ and RQ and XY and YZ, the SAS postulate cannot be used, since it states that the angle must be included between the sides. Unlike with ASA, where there is the AAS theorem for non-included sides, there is not SSA theorem for non-included angles, so the triangles cannot be proven to be congruent.
He spent 270 dollars. First i multiplied 110*3 and got 330. Then i had to subtract 600-330. and got 270.
i hope this helps :)
Answer:
d = 81
Step-by-step explanation:
Solve for d:
36 = (4 d)/9
Hint: | Reverse the equality in 36 = (4 d)/9 in order to isolate d to the left hand side.
36 = (4 d)/9 is equivalent to (4 d)/9 = 36:
(4 d)/9 = 36
Hint: | Multiply both sides by a constant to simplify the equation.
Multiply both sides of (4 d)/9 = 36 by 9/4:
(9×4 d)/(4×9) = 9/4×36
Hint: | Express 9/4×4/9 as a single fraction.
9/4×4/9 = (9×4)/(4×9):
(9×4)/(4×9) d = 9/4×36
Hint: | Express 9/4×36 as a single fraction.
9/4×36 = (9×36)/4:
(9×4 d)/(4×9) = (9×36)/4
Hint: | Cancel common terms in the numerator and denominator of (9×4 d)/(4×9).
(9×4 d)/(4×9) = (4×9)/(4×9)×d = d:
d = (9×36)/4
Hint: | In (9×36)/4, divide 36 in the numerator by 4 in the denominator.
36/4 = (4×9)/4 = 9:
d = 9×9
Hint: | Multiply 9 and 9 together.
9×9 = 81:
Answer: d = 81
Answer:
There is no picture to show us the transversal but it could be anywhere from 1 to 179
Step-by-step explanation:
