Let's say you have an idea that you want to present in writing. For an argument to be valid, it must have supporting evidence. An argument would just be useless if it did not have any documents or laws that would be supporting its justification. To say for example, I wanted to argue that the law of conservation of energy is not true. If I don't show actual evidence of energy being created, then that would leave me with an unclear, and most possibly invalid argument.
Answer:
x = 2
Price = $29
Step-by-step explanation:
If x is the number of $2 dollars increases, then the minimum number of increases required to meet her goal is:

The only realistic value is x = 2 $2 increases
If the original price was $25, then the new rice required to reach Amy's goal is:

The minimum ticket price is $29.
Answer:
1. B
2. A
Step-by-step explanation:
I've done this before, very easy.
Answer: -9 OR 15 (See explanation)
Step-by-step explanation:
Substitute 4 for t since t represents hours:
0.75t - 12 --> 0.75(4) - 12 =
3 - 12 =
-9
Something seems off, if you meant to put +12 instead of -12, then the answer is 15. Hope this helps, please consider making me Brainliest.
I’m pretty sure the answer is C