Hi there!
From this problem we can pull out some key information and remove any excess.
- The trail is 1/4 of a mile long.
- Angelo rode around the trail 8 times.
- Angelo claims he rode 8/4 miles.
- Teresa claims he rode 2 miles.
From that we know that if Angelo rode around the trail 8 times and the trail is 1/4 a mile, he in total rode 8/4 of a mile.
However, Teresa claims he rode 2 miles!
And the answer is... they're both correct!
Angelo did indeed ride 8/4 miles however that is equivalent to 2 miles so they are both in the right.
U do whats in the parenthesis first.....(2 / 12)....2 divided by 12
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We would set up the hypothesis test. This is a test of a single population mean since we are dealing with mean
For the null hypothesis,
µ = 152.5
For the alternative hypothesis,
µ ≠ 152.5
This is a two tailed test.
Since no population standard deviation is given, the distribution is a student's t.
Since n = 231
Degrees of freedom, df = n - 1 = 231 - 1 = 230
t = (x - µ)/(s/√n)
Where
x = sample mean = 148.9
µ = population mean = 152.5
s = samples standard deviation = 27.4
t = (148.9 - 152.5)/(27.4/√231) = - 2
We would determine the p value using the t test calculator. It becomes
p = 0.047
Since alpha, 0.05 > thanthere sufficient evidence to conclude that the self-efficacy of adults who have experienced childhood trauma differs from that in the general population of individuals the p value, 0.047, then we would reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, At a 5% level of significance, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the self-efficacy of adults who have experienced childhood trauma differs from that in the general population of individuals
Answer:
9.425 or 3π
Step-by-step explanation:
arc length = 2πr(θ/360)
The angle is 90˚ as indicated by the square symbol.
ABC = 2π6(90/360) = 9.425 or 3π
Answer:
I GOTCHU THE ANSWER IS -10
Step-by-step explanation: