Answer:
-31 (perhaps if I 100% knew what I was doing, but this is what I believe the answer should look like based on my research which consisted of me finding out the mechanics of such expressions from a website I found online)
Step-by-step explanation:
I have never had to solve a question like this, so my answer is to be taken with a grain of salt (bucket full).
When we see that funky symbol over there, we're going to want to do some funky things:
6
∑(-2k + 5)
k=3
So we'll substitute 3 for k, as seen here:
(-2(3) + 5)
But wait! We still got that 6, so we'll throw that in with the 3:
(-2(3 · 6) + 5)
From here, we PEMDAS or whatever you prefer until we're done!
(-2(18) + 5)
(-36 + 5)
(-31)
-31
[Processing ends successfully.. Just kidding, I ain't no robot!]
Answer:
-16
Step-by-step explanation:
5^2+7/5-7
32/-2
-16
If you mean classifying numbers, then I think -35.64 will be a real, rational number
Rational numbers are written as decimals or factions
If a number has a decimal or faction, the number can not be a integer. If its not a integer, then it cannot be a whole number.
Though these segments aren't marked congruent in the diagram, the two lines inside the circle making up the bases of the triangles are congruent as all radii are congruent. So the triangles are congruent by SAS.
Answer: 5:-)
Step-by-step explanation:
