Answer:
See explanation below
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, a director of manufacturing must convince management that a proposed manufacturing method reduces costs before the new method can be implemented. The current production method operates with a mean cost of $220 per hour.
a) The alternative and null hypotheses would be:
H0: μ ≥ 220
Ha: μ < 220
b) Comment on the conclusion when H0 cannot be rejected:
When we fail to reject the null hypothesis H0, there is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method cannot be implemented.
c) Comment on the conclusion when H0 can be rejected:
When the null hypothesis, H0 is rejected, there is enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method can be implemented.
10/10 in 1 whole and 1/100 in one whole
Can barely see the questions ! Retake a picture if you can.
Set the 2x - 1 equal to 9 then work backwards. 2x - 1 = 9 Nine minus one is eight divided by two is four. X = 4
Answer:
0.36 = 36% probability that the land has oil and the test predicts it
Step-by-step explanation:
Conditional Probability
We use the conditional probability formula to solve this question. It is
In which
P(B|A) is the probability of event B happening, given that A happened.
is the probability of both A and B happening.
P(A) is the probability of A happening.
45% chance that the land has oil.
This means that 
He buys a kit that claims to have an 80% accuracy rate of indicating oil in the soil.
This means that 
What is the probability that the land has oil and the test predicts it?
This is . So
0.36 = 36% probability that the land has oil and the test predicts it
