Answer:
The two figures are similar and hey are not solid.
Step-by-step explanation:
I think your question is missed of key information, allow me to add in and hope it will fit the original one.
<em>Leah claims that these figures are not similar. When she compared the heights, she wrote 2/7. Then she compared the bases and 21/6. Why is Leah having trouble? Explain completely</em>
(Please have a look at the attached photo)
My answer:
In the first ratio, she compared the small figure's height to the large figure's height that is: 2/7
In the second ratio, she compared the large figure's base to the small figure's base that is: 21/6
=> She is wrong in this step, the ratio must be 6/21
Hence she needs to compare bases and heights thorugh division because the ratio between heights and the ratio between bases must be equal
The scales are equal
=> Therefore, those rectangles are congruent.
Check the picture below.
since we know the endpoints of the diameter of the circle, then we can simply get the midpoint of those endpoints and that'd be the center,

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Given the expression
, we will use laws of indices to get the equivalent expression as shown below;
According to one of the law of indices,


This gives the required expression
60 payments of $496.77 add to 29,806.20, so the finance charges amount to
.. $29806.20 -24500.00 = $5,306.20
(2x - 2y)(2y + 8)
2x(2y+ 8) - 2y(2y + 8)
2x(2y) + 2x(8) - 2y(2y) - 2y(8)
4xy + 16x - 4y^2 - 16y
The answer is B.