Tina has the right to sue the company that sold her the product arguing that it had been recalled as potentially dangerous to consumers and she should be compensated for the damages caused by the dryer.
<h3>What should Tina do?</h3>
Tina must seek help from the Federal Trade Commission, this institution is in charge of protecting consumers and promoting competition between companies.
Based on the foregoing, Tina can rely on this institution to sue the company that sold her the dryer because this product had been withdrawn from the market for being dangerous.
So the company that sold him the dryer was committing a crime for selling this object. Additionally, this company must compensate Tina for the damages caused by this product.
Learn more about consumer in: brainly.com/question/950909
Answer:
the answer is C the Commerce Clause
Explanation: Monson and Raich sued, claiming that enforcing Federal law against them would violate the Commerce Clause, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, the Ninth Amendment, the Tenth Amendment, and the doctrine of medical necessity.
Answer: I would say A
Explanation:
Due to the simple fact that a hair simple contains DNA
Also, It couldn't be B because it is not a form of discipline
Where In the option of C it is not necessary for a conviction
Answer choice D; a hair sample is not going to lead to skeptical testimony because it is not testimonial evidence.
Answer: not at all.
Explanation: ive made every mistake i could have possibly made.
