Bonnie Parker was born on October 1, 1910, in Rowena, Texas. After meeting Clyde Barrow in 1930, Parker eventually entered a world of crime. Robbing banks and small businesses with her partner and affiliated gang, she became one of America's most infamous outlaws of the '30s. Their almost two-year crime spree spanned several states, with the gang responsible for the murder of several people that included law enforcement officials.
Bonnie and Clyde had many immediate effects and several long term effects on society. One of the biggest short-term effects was the loss families had after Bonnie or Clyde killed someone. One long-term effect was the fictionalized ideas of what Bonnie and Clyde were.
There were many short term effects that Bonnie and Clyde had on the society around them. The biggest short-term effect was the loss families had to deal with after Bonnie and Clyde had Killed one of their family members. Another short-term effect was obviously the change in the police officers lives that were after them, especially retired Texas Ranger Frank Hamer, who was specially brought in to take down Bonnie and Clyde.
While the long-term effects made by Bonnie and Clyde were not as significant to their immediate effects, they are still a large part of society today. One of the long-term effects created by these two was the fictionalized ideas of what the couple was. Even though they were bank robbers they never really had a lot of money and they often camped out and were constantly on the run. Another long-term effect that Bonnie and Clyde had on society is their reputation. When anyone thinks of classic bank robbers, two that instantly comes to mind are Bonnie and Clyde.
The people who moved to west in order to find work in factories. The correct option is 1st.
<h3>What are Factories?</h3>
Factories to the large area of the building where the raw material is assembled and converted into finished products. Many big and some machines are operated in the factory.
Many of the people moved to west in search of the job opportunity and to earn their livelihood in the mining factories and also in the barn fields.
Many of the male members relocated but not single male but with the whole family. First the male members relocated followed by their family members Thus second and third option are ruled out.
Those people didn't denied the ideas of the manifest destiny. Thus option 4th is also incorrect.
Therefore, the correct option is 1st.
Learn more about Factorial here:
brainly.com/question/12984720
#SPJ1
Good Morning!
the United States suffering no war damage and having a strong economy
All the factors presented have some relation with the truth. The main issue, however, is linked to the preservation of the American territory and its economic strengthening with the supply of arms and food.
Hugs!
Answer:
A month after the Democratic conference, Senator Carter Glass of Virginia, a. Democratic leader who received 78 votes for the presidential nomination in 1924, reasserted in his speech of April 5 at Asheville that “prohibition is not a party issue.” The speech was of interest both for its comments on the candidacy of Governor Smith of New York and as a disclosure of the reasoning that prevailed in the Democratic conference.
“Prohibition was not passed by the Democrats or by the Republicans,” Senator Glass said, “but by men of both parties and with no regard for party lines. It was a moral issue, So why in heaven's name should the Democrats make the eighteenth amendment a party issue in the next national campaign, as though electing a wet President would affect the prohibition law? If they do they might just as well take the presidency to the Republicans on a silver platter…They might just as well take their party out and dump it on the scrap heap.”If the Democratic party nominated Governor Smith as “an avowed exponent of the movement to repeal or modify the eighteenth amendment” or should it make prohibition an issue by platform declaration, Senator Glass said, the Democratic candidate would be “badly beaten” and the party “irretrievably wrecked.” He explained at the same time that “the presidency means nothing in the fight for modification,” that the President could not change the Constitution, and that his influence with Congress on such an issue “would be negligible,” In view of these facts Senator Glass believed the modification issue had no place in a presidential platform or a presidential campaign.
Explanation:
Here is just some information to get you started. I copied this off the web, so you cannot use it as direct writing, because that would be copy-right.
I promise you this is not a scam, but the rest of the information or the website I got the information from is linked below.
https://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre1927042300
