There is something wrong with this definition for a pair of vertical angles: “If AB and
1 answer:
Answer:
If AB and CD intersect at point P such that P is between A and B and is also between C and D, then ∠APC and ∠BPD are a pair of vertical angles.
Step-by-step explanation:
The diagram is a sketch of a counterexample. Notice that ∠APC and ∠BPD are actually the same angles and are not vertical angles.
If P is between A and B and is also between C and D, then ∠APC and ∠BPD are vertical angles. Then the statement can be completed as:
If AB and CD intersect at point P such that P is between A and B and is also between C and D, then ∠APC and ∠BPD are a pair of vertical angles.
You might be interested in
Answer: 42.24
Step-by-step explanation:
42.24
33 x 128
100
= 42.24
:( -_・)ᡕᠵ᠊ᡃ່࡚ࠢ࠘ ⸝່ࠡࠣ᠊߯᠆ࠣ࠘ᡁࠣ࠘᠊᠊ࠢ࠘
God may forgive your sins but i don’t
1.
Perpendicular. y=3x+4
Parallel. y=-1/3 x-8/3
2.
Perpendicular. y=-x-1
Parallel. y=x+11
3.
Perpendicular. y=7/4 x+8
Parallel. y=-7/4 x-9/7
4.
Perpendicular. y=4/5 x-3
Parallel. y=-5/4 x+35/2
yeesh, that took a while :) hope I helped!
The third statement is correct. <span> All
isosceles triangles are not similar. The pair of congruent angles
within one triangle is not necessarily congruent to the pair of
congruent angles within the other triangle. </span>
the second one.
Step-by-step explanation:
sjisidjdododpdpddod