There are two correct options from all the available ones in the question: alcohol has a highly inelastic demand and the government wants people to drink less.
A highly inelastic demand refers to an economic situation where demand for a product does not increase or decrease event though price rises or falls – even though the demand quantity for alcohol might fall, the total revenue will still be the same.
The second option is also correct since if the government levies a 40% tax on alcohol, they probably want the citizens to stop consuming them so much.
Answer:
Article III, Section II, US Constitution:
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
Explanation:
Answer:
a) it gave too much power to the people.
d) it didn't answer a lot of specific questions as to how to run the country.
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation failed because they did not give Congress and the national government enough power. The new United States just fought a war to end what they considered tyrannical rule of a strong government that overpowered local government and the leaders of the U.S. feared a powerful central government.
The answer is Marbury v. Madison
