Answer:
Relative prices would become more variable.
Menu and shoeleather costs would rise.
Hyperinflation could undermine the public's confidence in the economy.
Explanation:
The first reason that would make this to be effective is the hyperinflation that it will create and this is very bad for the economy as too much money will be chasing fewer goods.
Examples of what the effect of a paper money would be include: extreme hyperinflation can reduce the confidence of the public in the economy and economic policy; variability of the relative price between the countries will rise; shoeleather and menu costs will rise; it will result in an arbitrary change in tax liability; the level of uncertainty in the economy will rise and there will be an arbitrary wealth redistribution.
it should be noted this action would not deny the government seigniorage revenue from the inflation that would follow as the public will get the money dropped by the foreign airplanes.
Answer:
Journal entry
Explanation:
The journal entry is as follows
Cash $5,000
To other financing source - sale of capital assets $5000
(Being the sale in the general fund is recorded)
For recording this transaction we debited the cash account as it increases the asset account while credited the other financing source - sale of capital assets
Because people are desperate lol
Answer:
The answer is: A) the employees did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Explanation:
Reasonable expectation of privacy is included in the Fourth Amendment, and it refers to certain aspects of a person's life that should be private.
People can usually expect privacy at their homes, but once they are outside things can change a little. The law usually protects people from being exposed to humiliating situations in public or the exposure of private details of their life.
In a workplace, things can get even more trickier, since your employer has the right to "invade" your privacy because he has a legitimate interest to know (e.g. security cameras). In this case the employer notified the employees that their communications would be monitored, so the employees cannot argue that they thought they had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
