Answer:
The net income is $150,500 and the return on assets is 20.06 %
Explanation:
The formula for computing net income and return on assets is shown below and the computation is also made.
Net income = Sales revenue × Profit margin
= $2,150,000 × 7%
= $150,500
Return on assets = Net income ÷ total assets
= $150,500 ÷ $750,000
= 0.2006
= 20.06 %
Thus, the net income is $150,500 and the return on assets is 20.06 %
Answer:
Option (C) is correct
Explanation:
The payment is made during the discount period of 11 days so the 2% discount rate would be applicable.
Goods purchased = $112,000
Goods returned = $2,200
Discount = (Goods purchased - goods returned) × 2%
= ($112,000 - $2,200) × 2%
= $2,196
Net purchase = Goods purchased - returned - Discount
= $112,000 - $2,200 - $2,196
= $107,604
Total inventory cost = Net purchase + Freight cost
= $107,604 + $400
= $108,004
Therefore, company’s inventory increased by $108,004.
Answer:
3. Distribution
Explanation:
Distribution refers to making a product available to customers for purchase by transferring it from the source of manufacture to the retailers. Distribution is one of the essential components of marketing mix.
Channels to distribution are whole sellers, retailers, brokers and middlemen, and direct sales. Distribution entails all activities relating to supply of finished products to customers.
In the given case, Leon's work involves transportation of metal components as well as efficient movement of the finished systems from manufacturing unit to the warehouses and subsequently to distribution trucks. These represent activities of distribution.
Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
Answer:
<u>c. there is the possibility that the funds are used for riskier behavior than the lender agreed to.</u>
Explanation:
True. The term "Moral Hazard" as used in an investment context, often refers to a scenario where one party with a <em>lesser risk burden</em> in a business agreement, <u>deliberately </u>takes investment risk that would be detrimental to others in the agreement who have a higher risk burden.
It is an unethical business practice; a moral hazard, and so acts as a barrier to investors who may want to finance global growth.
