I think what would fill that blank space would be failure due to the fact that something with his business may have gone wrong or a wrong transaction was made. But sometimes these things can actually be a major plus for them without them even realizing before they made the choice.
The answer is letter a, it is because when doing a successful pitch or in order to achieve one, a person is not even required to stand behind a podium as it does not necessarily need or refer to a specific place to stand on when delivering a pitch but it is more important to show the product or service to attract the consumers.
Answer:
= $490
Explanation:
<em>Under the </em><em>First-in-First-Out </em>( FIFO ) <em>method of inventory valuation, inventories are valued using the price of the earliest batch in stock until the batch is exhausted when the price of the next oldest batch is used and so on.</em>
Date sale units Workings Value
10 10 × $19 190
20 (10 × $19)+( 10 × $20) 390
The cost o he merchandise = $190 + $390
= $490
Answer:
The correct answer is a. In arriving at taxable income, a taxpayer must choose between the standard deduction and itemized deductions.
Explanation:
In tax law, the tax base is the magnitude that results from the measurement of the taxable event. It is defined as the dimension or magnitude of an element of the objective budget of the taxable event that is judged as determining the relative contributory capacity.
In tax legal relations, the taxable event shows the existence of an economic capacity in the subjects, but for the tax to be applied, this fact must be assessed in some way, usually in monetary units.
The tax base is ultimately the magnitude that is used in each tax to measure the economic capacity of the subject, such that it is reflected in ceilings.
Jill will not win because this is an illusory promise without consideration.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Even if Jill sues his boss Constance for not giving him the bonus that she had promised to give if her employee, Jill works with great focus and dedication, he will probably not win the case.
The reason for this is that it was just a promise and not a contract signed between that employer and that employee. It was just an illusory promise which is not enough to sue the person or the employer. So there was no benefit of doing it.
