A time should be divided among the points of need, plan and practicality based on the level of knowledge that the listeners have about each point.
<h3>
What does discussing of policy entails?</h3>
These discussion involves a group of people in a firm or public that are required to debate or ask important question during the formation of a policy that will guide them.
Hence, the time on the discussion is expected to be divided among the points of need, plan and practicality depending on the level of knowledge that listeners have about each point.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Missing options <em>"Each point should be one-third of the presentation. It depends on the level of knowledge that listeners have about each point. Need should be the primary point and be given most time. All three points should be summarized quickly to allow time for discussion."</em>
Read more about policy
<em>brainly.com/question/1578160</em>
Answer:
Option E Tactical Planning
Explanation:
Tactical planning requires information for its middle level management who are managers. Managers set monthly objectives and plans how the way this objective would be achieved. After planning the strategy is and controlled to achieve the set targets.
In the question the employee is preparing schedules that is required by the tactical level management to understand the business atmosphere and make informed decisions.
There are good arguments on both sides as to when and how fast to reopen the economy. In my view, the answer will vary state by state and industry by industry. There’s also an enormous amount of uncertainty as to exactly how to determine the optimal policy. In that environment, there’s a great advantage to having these decisions be made at as local a level as possible. Thus, while I suspect that Sweden’s current policy is not optimal, that Nordic country is doing a great service to Europe by providing evidence on the consequences of an alternative policy path.
Giving too much power to any one person is dangerous, especially when that person might be influenced by political considerations that go beyond the best interest of the country as a whole:
That’s not to say Trump’s views are necessary wrong; rather that the procedure he uses to reach decisions is not reliable. Thus I’d still favor local control even if in one particular case you could convince me that the views of the person who happened to be president at the time were superior to the views of the average mayor or governor. In the long run, competition between states will produce better governance than central planning.
