Answer:
into how many geographical region Nepal has divided? describe them in a few line
Answer:
The answer is: A) If taxes are lowered, government revenues actually increase.
Explanation:
For example, when consumers have to pay less money in taxes, it means they will have more money to spend. Private consumption is the most important component of the GDP. When money starts to flow, a virtuous circle of growth starts a chain of events that reinforces economic growth through a feedback loop. When the economic growth rate increases, government revenue will also increase. The virtuous circle of growth is the most important pillar of the Keynesian economic theory.
The same applies to businesses, when they pay less taxes, they can invest more in new businesses which in turn increase economic growth, which results in higher revenue for the government.
Of course this theory applies to certain small tax reductions, and under certain specific circumstances.
An ethical dilemma is a complex situation that often involves an apparent mental conflict between moral imperatives, in which to obey one would result in transgressing another.
Answer:
When marginal cost meet with the demand curve
Explanation:
<em>The industry will do the most efficient allocation of resources when the marignal cost met the demand curve. </em>
When that occur the cost of producing an additional unit matches the amount the consumers are willing to pay for it thus, are in equilibrium.
The government will also have to look for the marginal revenue at this point to determinate wheter or not to subsidize the monopoly or not to avoid going bankruptcy
Answer:
D) Johnson has failed to use the correct cost driver as the cost-allocation base for setup costs.
Explanation:
One of the main disadvantages of ABC costing method is that it is very hard and expensive to implement, and sometimes you cannot allocate all overhead costs to specific cost drivers. That is what happened here with Johnson's costing method, they combined two cost drivers and allocated resources using the number customer orders which is not a valid base, e.g. one single large order represents higher costs than 10 small orders.
ABC costing is not accepted by US GAAP due to its limitations or how hard it is to apply correctly, but it is a very useful information source for making decisions. The problem is, if gathering the information is worth the effort and extra cost of ABC?
