The main problem with this team seems to be centered around differences in the formality of structure.
Cross-functional Work Team
This type of work team happens when individuals or groups of different functions come together to work together towards a common goal. This can either be done by two or more team leads to take the initiative or if there is a certain company project where employees of specific skills are required from different departments to do the job.
Problems with Cross-functional Team
There are certain problems faced when working in cross-functional teams. One of which is time management, where the team must meet up to manage the project and to discuss its further development. In the given question "time orientation" this certainly is not the main problem.
Another important factor is that employee success is based on goals and objectives. In doing so, the individual becomes more focused on their personal goals and loses sight of what is more important to prioritize, which is the company as a whole. Of course, this means that neither the interpersonal nor the goal orientation is the main problem arising between the team.
Finally, when more individuals come together to form a team, there is a chance that there might be dominating personalities in the group. This would cause difficulties among the group unless a leader is determined to manage the team. Now, this is the main problem here, as there is no formality of structure defined. Resulting in the dispute between managers and scientists. To avoid any further dispute formal structure must be laid out and a leader should be appointed amongst them.
Learn more on cross-functional team here: brainly.com/question/1490525
Answer:
Accounting and economics both involve plenty of number-crunching. But accounting is a profession devoted to recording, analyzing, and reporting income and expenses, while economics is a branch of the social sciences that is concerned with the production, consumption, and transfer of resources.
I hope it's helpful!
It is possible to question Jane Eyre’s
proto-feminism on the grounds that Jane only becomes Rochester’s
full equal (as she claims to be in the novel’s epilogue-like last
chapter) when he is physically infirm and dependent on her to guide
him and read to him—in other words, when he is physically incapable
of mastering her. However, it is also possible that Jane now finds
herself Rochester’s equal not because of the decline Rochester has
suffered but because of the autonomy that she has achieved by coming
to know herself more fully.<span />
Answer:
The statement is: True.
Explanation:
Compelling-state-interest-test balances the government's interest against an individual's right to be free of law. The test is part of the strict scrutiny analysis and is used as a precedent for future similar cases when the government legitimate interest is at risk.
Answer:
the compensatory time that would be received is 13.5 hours
Explanation:
The computation of the compensatory time that would be received is as follows:
Actual hours worked 95
Less: Regular working hours 86 (43 hours × 2)
Overtime hours worked 9
Now
Compensatory time 13.5 (9 hours × 1.5)
Hence, the compensatory time that would be received is 13.5 hours