Answer:
Ral's memory of how to avoid slicing the ball is probably 3. a procedural memory.
Explanation:
Procedural memory is in charge of remembering motor skills, it is the <em>storage of procedures,</em> as the name states.
It is part of the long-term memory and it becomes automatic because once an individual learns how to carry out an action, he/she does not have to think about how to do it again and simply does it.
This explains why Ral cannot describe how he avoids slicing the ball; this information is stored in the procedural memory and is therefore automatic. He doesn't have to think about how to do it anymore.
Answer: Subjective Method
Explanation: Assigned probability based on judgement or assertion is termed as Subjective. Subjective probability relies on an individual's personal perception or idea that an event will occur or otherwise. Subjective probability isn't based no any thorough research, scientific finding or market analysis, It is purely based on individual judgement and therefore it differs from one individual to another.
For instance, if an individual opines that it will rain tomorrow without accessing weather or any related information, then it's a subjective judgement.
Answer: The correct answers are 1-increase pluralistic ignorance 2- less likely to assume it's an emergency situation
Explanation:
Pluralistic ignorance is a concept in social psychology that refers to a situation in which a group of people reject certain norms or behavior but go along with it because they feel and assume (Sometimes incorrectly) that other people accept it.
Pluralistic ignorance can explain the By-stander effect that leads people to think "if no one is saying anything or doing anything then I'm not going to say or do anything".
In this particular case, Gillian heard a squeal of brakes and a crash. She looks around and notices that no one was affected by that noise and subsequently she stays calm.
(D) legislation is hearer you make and enforce a law. Hope this helped.
Answer:
d. Either A or C
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Big Corp will likely win if it can establish as a defense that either Pam was denied the promotion for legitimate non-discriminatory reasons or the denial of the promotion was based on mixed motives. Any of these two defenses would tell the court that there were other reasons as to why Pam was denied the promotion and it is not due to gender, which would make Pam's argument invalid.
