OPTIONS:
A. establish a Chinese Wall between the research personnel and the sales personnel
B. register both the research personnel and the sales personnel in each State where the IA's services are offered
C. cross-train the research personnel and the sales personnel in each other's functions so that in the event of a confidentiality breach, one can take over the functions of the other
D. establish two separate IA firms registered with the State with one only having research personnel and the other only having sales personnel
Answer: A. establish a Chinese Wall between the research personnel and the sales personnel
Explanation: In a bid to maintain confidentiality and avoid leakage of vital information, there must be a barrier between the research personnels who makes findings on investment opportunities and packages for client needs and the sales personnels. This is because, research and investment informations are treated as classified and leakage could lead to bias, whereby some consumers will get the information and make moves before other consumers are informed via official release by the firm.
Answer:
7 loans were made to clients with Graduate education who also had 17 years of experience
Explanation:
We have to solve for which is the intersection between the two groups.
66 is the count for +17 years
83 is the count for Graduate
the two groups is 149 loans
Then, we have 142 loans which are not part of both groups. Therefore, the difference are the loan count which do belong to both groups:
149 total loans - 142 loans out = 7
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer:
Identify labour supply-demand gaps
Explanation:
Theresa as an HR manager must identify the labour supply-demand gaps. She has identified the firm's labour demand, and now the next step should be to identify the supply of labour and then to understand the gap. The labour supply-demand gap will help the HR manager to identify the possible changes which she must do to fulfil the firm's labour demand.
