Answer:
In 1debate over the issue, Kentucky Senator Henry Clay proposed another compromise. It had four parts: first, California would enter the Union as a free state; second, the status of slavery in the rest of the Mexican territory would be decided by the people who lived there; third, the slave trade (but not slavery) would be abolished in Washington, D.C.; and fourth, a new Fugitive Slave Act would enable Southerners to reclaim runaway slaves who had escaped to Northern states where slavery was not allowed.
Bleeding Kansas
But the larger question remained unanswered. In 1854, Illinois Senator Stephen A. Douglas proposed that two new states, Kansas and Nebraska, be established in the Louisiana Purchase west of Iowa and Missouri. According to the terms of the Missouri Compromise, both new states would prohibit slavery because both were north of the 36º30’ parallel. However, since no Southern legislator would approve a plan that would give more power to “free-soil” Northerners, Douglas came up with a middle ground that he called “popular sovereignty”: letting the settlers of the territories decide for themselves whether their states would be slave or free.
Northerners were outraged: Douglas, in their view, had caved to the demands of the “slaveocracy” at their expense. The battle for Kansas and Nebraska became a battle for the soul of the nation. Emigrants from Northern and Southern states tried to influence the vote. For example, thousands of Missourians flooded into Kansas in 1854 and 1855 to vote (fraudulently) in favor of slavery. “Free-soil” settlers established a rival government, and soon Kansas spiraled into civil war. Hundreds of people died in the fighting that ensued, known as “Bleeding Kansas.”
A decade later, the civil war in Kansas over the expansion of slavery was followed by a national civil war over the same issue. As Thomas Jefferson had predicted, it was the question of slavery in the West–a place that seemed to be the emblem of American freedom–that proved to be “the knell of the union.”
Question : Which one of the following statements contains bias?
Logical Answer : B. The employees whined about their low wages.
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
It is a direct approach to conflict.
Martha thinks it is better to get angry rather than hide or suppress her feelings, so that her husband knows she really cares about the issue.
What makes option A the best answer, is because she does not want to hide the details from the issue, she prefers to let it out of the bag than keeping it in and it keeps burning until the un-usual happens which is not always the best method to resolve conflicts.
It is direct because she believes its better her husband knows she is angry and then settle the matter than allowing the issue to keep burning inside of her. it is direct because the matter made her angry and she is expressing it other than neglecting it.
Answer:
50% of the hatched chickens would be speckled, 25% would be black and 25% would be 25%
Explanation:
The black chickens are the dominant allele and the white chicken are the recessive allele. Since the black chicken is dominant, Let the genotype of the black chickens be (BB) and the genotype of the white chicken be (ww).
If the Black and white chicken are cross bred and the eggs hatched are black with white speckles, i.e (Bw). The genotype of all the hatched chickens would be (Bw). Where Bw is speckled chicken.
If the hatched chicken with genotype (Bw) are interbred, the resulting hatched chickens genotype would be BB, Bw, Bw and ww for four offsprings. This shows that 50% of the hatched chickens would be speckled, 25% would be black and 25% would be 25%
Answer:
a person should maintain their culture cause that's who they are and how they grew up and as far as their identity they should keep it all unless they are in a place that's not Mexico illegally
Explanation:
