1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
svetlana [45]
2 years ago
12

Please paraphrase this :

Law
1 answer:
algol [13]2 years ago
8 0

Paraphrase = express the meaning of (the writer or speaker or something written or spoken) using different words, especially to achieve greater clarity.

The Loose interpretation states that the Federal government can do what is good for the country even if the Constitution doesn't explicitly allow it, but the Strict interpretation states that the Federal government can only do what the Constitution says it can do.

         Can become

                  \/

    The Loose interpretation says that the Federal government can do something outside of the Constitution as long as it is good for the country. That being said, the strict interpretation says that the Federal government must stick to the Constitution.

No hacer español para esto, ya que está escrito en inglés

You might be interested in
Cinco ejemplos de sometimiento sufrido por mujeres
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

A lo largo de la historia y hasta el surgimiento del movimiento feminista, las mujeres se encontraron en un lugar relegado en la sociedad. Varios son los ejemplos de esta situación, entre los que podemos mencionar:

-el sometimiento ideológico, al prohibirseles el voto hasta bien entrado el siglo XX. Hasta hace 100 años atrás, las mujeres no tenían la posibilidad de expresarse en las urnas.

-las mujeres, en sus trabajos, aun hoy en día sufren discriminación salarial: cobran menos que los hombres por el mismo trabajo realizado.

-la total dependencia de los labores domésticos, los cuales son otorgados en forma egoísta a la mujer por parte del hombre. La mujer muchas veces ocupa un rol de "sirvienta" al servicio del hombre, completando todos los quehaceres de la casa sin ayudas.

-el sometimiento económico, por el cual en el pasado no se permitía a la mujer trabajar, con lo cual se la hacia absolutamente dependiente económicamente del hombre.

-la desigualdad en los puestos de poder entre hombres y mujeres, la cual se ve explicitada en la proporción de mujeres con altos cargos políticos en comparación con la cantidad de hombres en los mismos.

3 0
3 years ago
How can people ensure that governments do not restrict their rights and freedoms?
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

Some ways people can ensure that their rights are not restricted by the government include;

1. Active participation in political activities such as voting.

2. Preventing the formation of a one-party system.

3. Defending institutions like the courts against governmental intimidation.

4. Peaceful protests when their rights are breached.

5. Holding lawmakers, and representatives accountable when important decisions are to be made.

6. Patriotism and incorruptibleness in their individual positions.

Explanation:

Some governments that were instituted for the people turn against their citizens and restrict their rights. There are several ways in which citizens can prevent the government from restricting their rights. Some of them include;

1. Active participation in political activities: This will make the will of the people to be reflected in the daily activities of the government.

2. Preventing the formation of a one-party system: Most tyrannical governments begin by silencing the voice of their opposition thus making them the only existing and controlling party.

3. Defending institutions like the courts: Tyrannical governments sometimes intimidate or bribe judges to execute their will. The judges and citizens must resist all such efforts.

4. Peaceful protests: When their rights are breached, citizens should use legal measures or peaceful protests to register their displeasure.

5. Holding representatives accountable: When lawmakers pass bills that are not suitable for the people, their ward members should resist such moves.

6. Patriotism and incorruptibleness: Tyrannical governments thrive in corrupt societies. Citizens must be patriotic and incorruptible at every level that they find themselves.

5 0
3 years ago
Hello Dana Sides (Log out if this isn't you.)
svp [43]
The answer would be $448 per day
3 0
2 years ago
Are communications skills needed when writing a police report? Explain why or why not
Roman55 [17]

Answer:

Yes and no.

Explanation:

Well if you are communicationg with someone who is telling their story and you need to write a report about it, then yes you may need to consult and have good communication skills. But if you are writing a police report first hand from your expirerence then no. You can just write it down and don't need to ask anyone about your report because it is a first eye witness.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pls help! I just need help
amm1812

Answer: C. The Supreme Court ruled that Dred Scott was not entitled to the rights of citizenship, which inflamed sectional tensions that eventually led to the outbreak of the Civil War.

Details:

Dred Scott was a slave who had been owned by a Missouri man named John Emerson.  Emerson's service in the US military caused him to live for a time in Illinois (which was a free state) and Wisconsin (which was a free territory.  Later, back in Missouri, after John Emerson died, Scott tried to purchase his freedom from Emerson's widow, who refused.  With lawyers' help, he then filed suit to gain his freedom on the grounds that he had lived in a free state and free territory.

In Dred Scott  v. Sandford (1857), commonly referred to simply as "The Dred Scott case," the Supreme Court, by a 7 to 2 margin, issued its ruling that Scott was not  entitled to his freedom just because he had lived at some times in free territory.  The Court also ruled that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States, and therefore did not have the legal standing to file such a lawsuit.  The Court further stated that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 had been an overreach of federal government power -- that any states or territories were free to make their own decisions regarding slavery.

The Dred Scott decision was a controversial event which played into the tensions that by 1861 erupted into the Civil War in the United States.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/10791169#readmore

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 3. Any pursuit driving should be done with the aim of minimizing the risk to:
    7·2 answers
  • You are a person who feels that the most important constitutional principles are the
    13·1 answer
  • What two situations must occur to appeal to a higher court in a criminal case?
    6·1 answer
  • 3. Is freedom of speech even relevant in a functional society?
    15·1 answer
  • Discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages of the reparations Germany paid at the end of World War I. Why do you think the
    7·1 answer
  • The diffrense between self-confidence and self-esteem​
    14·1 answer
  • Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
    7·1 answer
  • Who are the various stakeholder in this scenario and what do they each have at stake in your action
    5·1 answer
  • Does the manager of a licensed establishment need to obtain an rbs certification?.
    9·1 answer
  • courts normally follow the rule of stare decisis when deciding cases. there are times, however, as in state v. witt, a new jerse
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!