Answer:
citizens will decide not to contribute at all
Explanation:
According to my research on various economic studies, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this plan is unfeasible because individual citizens have no immediate visible effect on tax implementations. In other words no individual's contribution to tax revenue is critical to whether the government is capable of providing public goods, so citizens do not have an incentive to contribute. Therefore the most likely effect of this policy would be that citizens will decide not to contribute at all.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Poor people didn't have much money or food and worked as servants to farmers. That would be the first part, but the last part I don't know.
Hate Violence is one term for this
The Constitution i am pretty sure
It is 90%. One parent can have the just sole physical authority of the youngsters or both physical and legitimate guardianship. It is frequently less demanding for moms to get sole physical guardianship of exceptionally youthful youngsters since courts regularly grant care to the parent who has been the kid's essential parental figure.
