1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lawyer [7]
2 years ago
14

‘Remixing technologies is how are kids speak."" Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not?

Law
1 answer:
Tcecarenko [31]2 years ago
6 0
Remixing technologies is how our kids speak.” Do you agree with this statement? ... A:Yes because kids are getting more and more into technology at a very young age and need to know what it's like without an ipphone or laptop like the rest of us.
You might be interested in
Rawls might criticize Locke’s social contract on which of the following grounds?
ratelena [41]

Answer:

a) The parties to the contract know too much about their particular interests and as a result, the terms of the contract are not necessarily fair.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
A state's legislative branch?
Ket [755]

Answer:

hold power with the upper house legislative

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is the best definition of it scientific theory ​
amm1812

Answer: A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
My last made me feel like i would never try again but when i saw you ....​
qwelly [4]

Answer:

i felt something i never felt come closer ill give u all my love if u treat me right baby ill give u everything

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the supreme court's main decision in Palko v. Connecticut?
VashaNatasha [74]

In Palko v. Connecticut (1937), the Supreme Court had to decide whether "due process of law" means states must obey the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment

<u>Explanation: </u>

The observation of the Supreme Court is that the convict cannot be punished two times for the same offense. It is simple and very clear that the convict cannot be punished under the fourth and fifth amendments for same offense.

In this particular case, the prosecution has charged Frank Palko for first-degree murder and the court has given a decree as life imprisonment. But the actual nature crime amounts to second-degree murder.

So, the state of Connecticut appealed against this judgment and it has been proved that offense made by Frank Palko amounts to second-degree murder and the death penalty is awarded to convict. The Supreme Court's main decision in Palko vs Connecticut was Palko was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How does the right to file a lawsuit protect people?
    9·1 answer
  • What did Supreme Court decisions incorporating the Bill of Rights mean?
    12·2 answers
  • What is the only treatment item that is on both sides of the DD Form 1380 (TCCC) card?
    10·1 answer
  • What is a law in question ?
    11·2 answers
  • •What is prisoner reentry?<br> •What are current issues and trends in parole and prisoner reentry?
    13·1 answer
  • What is Conciseness and provide a real-life example of law enforcement using conciseness when implementing technical writing?
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    5·1 answer
  • How many different laws are there will give best answer brainest
    15·2 answers
  • Use the following image to answer the question. Flowchart with 6 boxes. Box A sits at the very bottom of the left side of the fl
    13·2 answers
  • What are the steps that police officers take during a traffic stop? Provide an example.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!