1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sesenic [268]
2 years ago
10

Which judicial principle does this passage from the Marbury v. Madison Supreme court ruling illustrate?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Leto [7]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Which judicial principle does the passage from the the Marbury v Madison Supreme Court ruling illustrates?

The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.

Explanation:

Which judicial principle does the passage from the the Marbury v Madison Supreme Court ruling illustrates?

The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.

You might be interested in
"Among some of the reasons why unmitigated skepticism is difficult for a person to consistently hold as a serious philosophical
ICE Princess25 [194]

Answer:

It is based on dogmatism.

Explanation:

While Skepticism is a term in philosophy, which is considered as a behavior, or a form of doubt in relation to the truth of a particular thing or situation. It stated that absolute certain knowledge is impossible.

On the other hand, Unmitigated skepticism which is a form of skepticism, claims that categorically and dogmatically it knows that no one knows anything. This appears contradictory and apparently self-defeating.

Hence, among some of the reasons why unmitigated skepticism is difficult for a person to consistently hold as a serious philosophical position is because it dogmatically accept a position or knowledge that no one knows anything, which is self-defeating and contradictory.

8 0
3 years ago
Help please!
Sedaia [141]

Answer:

Political polarization (see American and British English spelling differences) is the extent to which opinions on an issue are opposed, and the process by which this opposition increases over time. ... Polarization is associated with the process of politicization.

Social polarization is the segregation within a society that emerges when factors such as income inequality, real-estate fluctuations and economic displacement result in the differentiation of social groups from high-income to low-income.

_

Political polarization is the extent to which opinions on an issue are opposed, and the process by which this opposition increases over time. Most discussions of polarization in political science consider polarization in the context of political parties and democratic systems of government.

#mark me brainliest plz.. :)

8 0
3 years ago
How do we know the Earth is moving, and not the Sun?
lilavasa [31]

Answer:

develops a geocentric model that has the planets moving around the Earth. However, in order to account for retrograde motion, he put the planets on circles that move in circles. * Copernicus suggests a heliocentric model. His model has the planets moving around the Sun in circular orbits.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why must informative speakers be careful not to overestimate what the audience knows about the topic? listeners can become lost
Ann [662]

Answer:

Listeners can become lost

Explanation:

Informative speakers need to judge their audience before they speak. They need to know some facts about their listeners, where do they come from, from which background socially and ethnically, and they may want to know something about their religion or interests. This way they can judge the level of the audience's knowledge about the subject they will speak upon.

If the informative speakers overestimate the listeners' knowledge on a particular subjects, the listeners will become frustrated because they won't understand what the speakers are telling them. They may consider themselves to stupid or not knowledgeable enough to listen to this speech. After trying to understand, they give up in the end and <em>can become lost</em>, not understanding the speaker and the topic he speaks upon.

7 0
3 years ago
Airports, school board of educations, CAT bus systems are all examples of a
earnstyle [38]

Answer:

Not 100% sure but I think its special purpose

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was Spain enriched by its colonies??
    7·2 answers
  • What percent of the country was considered poor in 1900
    10·1 answer
  • What was a key feature of the European renaissance
    9·1 answer
  • 50+25 PTS!!! YOU WILL REPORTED FOR SENSELESS ANSWERS!
    7·1 answer
  • Although methods in determining one’s personality are not perfect, research on the Big Five has supported the validity of trait
    5·2 answers
  • Teresa has an intense and terrifying feeling that she is no longer real and that she is looking at herself and the world from a
    15·2 answers
  • Research has shown that in the modern multinational enterprise, core competencies and skills typically reside in the home countr
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these is the best description of a culture's social structure? A In the American South, common "soul food" dishes inclu
    13·1 answer
  • One effect of the Fourth Amendment is that
    15·1 answer
  • Sarah works as an rbt in the local school system. she was at a party, drank one too many drinks and was arrested for driving whi
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!