Jenny & Natasha are working on a problem together: Solve x/3 + 8 = −2. Natasha thinks the first step is to multiply by 3. Je
1 answer:
The individual that is correct is Natasha. This is because the answer can be gotten using Natasha's method
The given equation is
<u><em>Solving the equation using </em></u><u><em>Natasha's</em></u><u><em> method </em></u>
the fist step is to multiply by 2
x + 24 = - 6
The second step is to combine and add similar terms
x = -24 - 6
x = -30
<u><em /></u>
<u><em>Second method of solving the equation</em></u>
The equation the friends are trying to solve is
The first step is to combine similar terms
= - 8 - 2
The second step is to add similar terms together
= - 10
The third step is to multiply both sides of the equation by 3
x = (-10 x 3)
x = -30
A similar question was answered here: brainly.com/question/18613652?referrer=searchResults
You might be interested in
Answer:
<u>24 meters</u> is the width of the original rectangle.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Bobby knows that the perimeter of the original rectangle is 120 meters. He also knows that the perimeter of the reduced rectangle is 30 meters and the reduced rectangle has a length of 9 meters.
Now, to get the width of original rectangle.
The reduced rectangle's perimeter = 30 meters.
The reduced rectangle's length = 9 meters.
Now, we find the width of reduced rectangle by using formula:
Let the width of reduced rectangle be
<em>Subtracting both sides by 18 we get:</em>
<em /><em />
<em>Dividing both sides by 2 we get:</em>
The width of reduced rectangle = 6 meters.
Now, to get the width of original rectangle:
Let the width of original rectangle be
<em>As given, the perimeter of the original rectangle = 120 meters.</em>
<em>And, the perimeter of reduced rectangle is 30 meters and its width is 6 meters.</em>
<em>So, 30 is equivalent to 6.</em>
<em>Thus, 120 is equivalent to </em><em />
Now, to get the width using cross multiplication method:
<em>By cross multiplying we get:</em>
<em /><em />
<em>Dividing both sides by 30 we get:</em>
<em /><em />
<em>The width of original rectangle = 24 meters.</em>
Therefore, 24 meters is the width of the original rectangle.
Answer:
The function would be linear because the rate of change is constant.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
per minute
See attachment for complete question and options
First, we write the function that calculates the cost (C(t)) for t minutes.
This is calculated as:
Rewrite as:
A function that has the above format is referred to as a linear function which has the general format
Where
m represents the slope/rate and it is constant
From the list of given options, (a) is correct.
Answer:
5
5Step-by-step explanation:
If you use the distance formula you can solve it pretty easily. The distance formula is:
d =
The two points you want are A and D. A is (-1, -4) and D is (3, -1). Plug that into the formula...
d =
d =
d =
d =
5
I can solve it in a different way if you want me to.