Hi there!
The principle of SOCIAL CONFORMITY.
It showed that people tend to engage behaviours more likely in confirmation of the society at large.
The interesting question is when everybody is thinking about confirming then who decide what behavior to engage in, from the start? That is if we are supposed to DRINK in a Social gathering when all are drinking. Then who thought that Drinking is to be done by all, or who sets the social norm and how is the degree of strictness understood and enforced?
is it something we just think and that the norms doesn't actually exist?
Some food for thought!
hope it make sense!
<span>One reason why political parties do not take stronger policy positions on issues and enforce them is that PARTY MEMBERSHIP IS TOO MODERATE. Because the party membership is moderate, a lot of the members would leave if the political party began to make extremely strong policy changes.</span>
Answer:
Ecological Validity
Explanation:
According to my research on different research methodology, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this study is lacking in Ecological Validity. This refers to to the extent to which the findings of a research study are able to be generalized to real-life settings. This is because like mentioned in the question this study is addressing a situation that does not happen in everyday life therefore it cannot be generalized to a real-life settings.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The correct answer is letter D.
Explanation: The American constitutional charter was formed by a restricted series of articles. Created in 1787, the document paved the way for US states to have the autonomy to draft a series of laws that would address issues of a more specific nature.