25 <span>percent of children show emotional or psychological problems 2-3 years after their parent's divorce.
A child generally relies on their parents to form their behavior and personalities. When one of that person removed from their life, they have a tendency to experience some sort of emotional distortion due to the difficulty in accepting the truth</span>
Answer:
A. Life without parole.
Explanation:
Texas is one of the 31 states who offer life without parole as an option for some offenders. It basically means that they have to stay in prison for the rest of their life, without a chance to get on a parole.This resulted in less sentences to the death penalty, by lethal injection. This is most commonly used for hard cases of murder, or sexual abuses. Some justify this decision with the argument that the offender has no potential for rehabilitation and to successfully once again become a functioning part of a society.
Maybe to have the same relatives. I'm not sure it's very weird to me.
Answer:
Active political participation is important for US citizens because of how the US Government gets it's power by the people of the country, as is how most democracies work. Therefore, without that input, the government could not make laws or anything of the sort.
Explanation:
If you have a democracy and people, the people must make the decisions for the democracy because aforementioned twice democracy cannot make it's own decisions, according to the US Constitution. This would leave the government unable to do anything, the country would supposedly fall into a revolt and collapse.
Answer:
B. extortion.
Explanation:
In the context of law, extortion is defined as a criminal offence where an offender/criminal obtains something, particularly money or property, through force or violent threats.
If we look into the above scenario, the two criminals have committed a series of offences, however, they did not force nor threat the client to invest his money into their scheme. Therefore, they cannot be charged with extortion by the court.
Instead they would be charged with criminal conspiracy for scheming a fraud, money laundering for transfering the money into their family business to conceal income and deceit for deceiving the man with lies.
