Answer:
0.083
Step-by-step explanation:
151 divided by 1800 is 0.083
might be wrong WARNING
Answer:
0.87
Step-by-step explanation:
0.8/4=0.2
0.7-0.81=-0.11
3*-0.11=-0.33
1.2+-0.33=0.87
Not completely. If the first ball was red, then there is a higher chance the second ball is blue. If the first ball was blue, then there is a lower chance the second ball is blue. Please mark Brainliest!!!
Answer: If two sides in one triangle are congruent to two sides of a second triangle, and also if the included angles are congruent, then the triangles are congruent. Using labels: If in triangles ABC and DEF, AB = DE, AC = DF, and angle A = angle D, then triangle ABC is congruent to triangle DEF.
Hope it helps
Complete question :
The table shows data collected on the relationship between time spent playing video games and time spent with family. The line of best fit for the data is ý = -0.36x + 94.5.
Video Games (Minutes) Time with Family (Minutes)
40 80
55 75
70 69
85 64
A) According to the line of best fit, the predicted number of minutes spent with family for someone who spent 36 minutes playing video games is 81.54.
B) Is it reasonable to use this line of best fit to make the above prediction?
Answer:
81. 54
4) The estimate, a predicted time of 81.54 minutes, is both reliable and reasonable.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that :
The equation of best fit is defined as :
ý = -0.36x + 94.5.
A.) Predicted number of minutes spent with family (y) for someone who spends 36 minutes playing games (x) will be :
x = 36
From the model :
ý = -0.36(36) + 94.5
y = - 12.96 + 94.5
y = 81.54
Hence.nunber of minutes spent with family = 81.54 minutes.
B.) The correlation Coefficient for the model is - 0.9993, which indicates a very strong negative relationship between both variables. Hence, using this fact, we can conclude that the prediction is reliable. From the data also, spending 36 minutes playing games means such individual will have more time than someone who plays games for 40 minutes, hence, the prediction is also reasonable.
