Answer:
The correct answer is option i.
Explanation:
A firm is operating in a perfectly competitive market.
The firm is selling 200 units of output.
The price of each unit of output is $3.
In a perfectly competitive market, a single firm faces a horizontal line demand curve. This horizontal line represents demand, price line, average revenue, and marginal revenue.
So if the price is $3, it implies that the marginal revenue and average revenue is also equal to $3.
The total revenue is $600.
Answer:C. Damage to completed cars held on a storage lot
Explanation:
Operational risk are the hazards and the uncertainties that are faced by companies in the day to day activities. It may be caused as a result of system failure or manufacturing components.
An example of operational risk for a company that manufactures automobiles would be damage to completed cars held on a storage lot.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": strike vote.
Explanation:
Collective Bargaining is the act by which employees organized in labor unions negotiate with employers (mainly managers) about compensations and work conditions. <em>Wages, working hours, merit pay, </em>and <em>vacation length</em>, are common topics of discussion between the two parties.
<em>A strike is the stop of operations of a company because of unattended labor union request. The decision of going on a strike or not relies merely on the union and the </em><u><em>strike vote</em></u><em> is subject to that group only.</em>
Answer:
time bond
Explanation:
time frame given to achieve that goal
Answer:
d.mitigating
Explanation:
This is a mitigating factor. A mitigating factor is a fact of relevance as it can reveal the motivations of the crime. Although not sufficient to absorb the defendant, except in cases of self-defense, when there is evidence of mitigating factors, this can be used to soften a defendant's penalty if it is proven that the motive for the crime was not misleading. A good example is the case in which the defendant committed a murder, and he was sentenced to death, but there is a mitigating factor: the defendant suffered physical abuse for years and killed his attacker. The jury can understand that the defendant committed the crime due to the suffering caused by the victim, which would be different from a crime motivated by trite motives. Thus, the death penalty can be understood as disproportionate and it can be reversed to a less severe penalty.
