1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
I am Lyosha [343]
3 years ago
10

Why is it important to choose a relevant scale for analyzing data sets in science?

Chemistry
1 answer:
alexdok [17]3 years ago
3 0
<h3>Explanation;</h3>

<h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."</h2><h2 /><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.</h2><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.If the data is related to areas where we did not have a whole lot of existing data - space, weather or even all the new fitness trackers we all wear these days.</h2><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.If the data is related to areas where we did not have a whole lot of existing data - space, weather or even all the new fitness trackers we all wear these days.The fitness tracker data wasnt available a few years back, so more data is probably going to change the data, especially once the adoption moves from the early adopters (tech and fitness geeks) to other people - old people. kids etc - bet there is not much data related to them.</h2><h2 /><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.If the data is related to areas where we did not have a whole lot of existing data - space, weather or even all the new fitness trackers we all wear these days.The fitness tracker data wasnt available a few years back, so more data is probably going to change the data, especially once the adoption moves from the early adopters (tech and fitness geeks) to other people - old people. kids etc - bet there is not much data related to them.Without knowing what type of data, the amount and quality of existing data, it is hard to generalize.</h2>

<h2><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Confirm</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em></h2><h2><em><u>#Brainliest</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Answer</u></em></h2>
You might be interested in
Name two physical properties of gold.
Olin [163]

Answer:

All of the above.

Explanation:

Gold is yellowish it is soft and malleable and also very dense.

8 0
4 years ago
Why is earth's core mostly made of iron
Triss [41]
It is less dense than most other material and has a higher melting point so it will not melt.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
can someone plz help CLICK ON THE PICTURE and PLZ DONT ANSWER MY QUESTION IF UR NOT GONNA PUT THE ACTUAL ANSWER PLZ
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

Li2S

KNO2

CuO

CaCO3

LiF

8 0
3 years ago
Why aren’t dominant genes ALWAYS more common?
Zolol [24]

Answer:

selective breeding

Explanation:

Example:  pretend that rabbits can only be brown or black and black is dominant. If only the brown rabbits reproduce it will eventually be more common    Hope this helps

5 0
3 years ago
Calculate how much carbohydrate a 175-pound athlete who is in training 4-5 hours per day should eat each day in order to enhance
Kamila [148]

Answer:

The athlete should consume about 476 g of carbohydrates per day to maintain a good storage of glycogen in his body

Explanation:

For an athlete who trains daily, 5 to 7 g of carbohydrates per Kg of body weight per day is recommended;

∴ m athlete = (175 Lb)×(0.453592 Kg/Lb) = 79.3787 Kg

⇒ m carbohydrate = (79.3787 Kg)×( 6 g carbohydrate/ Kg.day) = 476.27 g carbohydrate/day

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Some common fossil fuels are gasonline,____, coal and natural gas
    8·1 answer
  • Intermolecular Forces and Physical Properties of Pure Substances
    6·1 answer
  • Two clear liquids are poured into a beaker. Which is a clear sign that a precipitation reaction has occurred?
    15·1 answer
  • After your product alkyl ether is recrystallized and dried how do you test the purity
    11·1 answer
  • In the equation 2 H2 + O2 → 2 H2O, the H2 molecules are ________ and the H2O molecules are ________.
    11·1 answer
  • A sample of nitrogen gas is at a pressure of 1.20 atm, a volume of 30.0 liters, and a
    10·1 answer
  • What is an oxidizing agent?​
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!! i give a lot of points
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements are TRUE for BOTH oxygen and sulfur atoms?
    9·1 answer
  • When a substance goes through a chemical change, it forms a new substance that has different physical and chemical properties. O
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!