1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
I am Lyosha [343]
3 years ago
10

Why is it important to choose a relevant scale for analyzing data sets in science?

Chemistry
1 answer:
alexdok [17]3 years ago
3 0
<h3>Explanation;</h3>

<h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."</h2><h2 /><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.</h2><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.If the data is related to areas where we did not have a whole lot of existing data - space, weather or even all the new fitness trackers we all wear these days.</h2><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.If the data is related to areas where we did not have a whole lot of existing data - space, weather or even all the new fitness trackers we all wear these days.The fitness tracker data wasnt available a few years back, so more data is probably going to change the data, especially once the adoption moves from the early adopters (tech and fitness geeks) to other people - old people. kids etc - bet there is not much data related to them.</h2><h2 /><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.If the data is related to areas where we did not have a whole lot of existing data - space, weather or even all the new fitness trackers we all wear these days.The fitness tracker data wasnt available a few years back, so more data is probably going to change the data, especially once the adoption moves from the early adopters (tech and fitness geeks) to other people - old people. kids etc - bet there is not much data related to them.Without knowing what type of data, the amount and quality of existing data, it is hard to generalize.</h2>

<h2><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Confirm</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em></h2><h2><em><u>#Brainliest</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Answer</u></em></h2>
You might be interested in
How do you figure out the number of electrons, neutrons, and protons of an element by only being given the mass?
Irina18 [472]
<span>Get a periodic table of elements. ...Find your element on the periodic table. ...Locate the element's atomic number. ...Determine the number of electrons. ...Look for the atomic mass of the element. ...<span>Subtract the atomic number from the atomic mass.</span></span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain what happens to temperature and energy as molecules move from gas to liquid to solid
aleksley [76]

Answer and Explanation:

As the temperature of the substances increases, the average energy of the molecules increases, and average energy of attraction between the molecules decreases consequently intermolecular spacing between the molecules increases. As a result, a substance change in succession from gas to liquid to solid.

7 0
3 years ago
How many moles of Cu do you need to react with 12 moles of O2?<br> 2Cu(s) + O2(g) 2CuO(s)
zzz [600]

Answer:

24 mol Cu

General Formulas and Concepts:

<u>Chemistry</u>

  • Stoichiometry

Explanation:

<u>Step 1: Define</u>

RxN: 2Cu (s) + O₂ (g) → 2CuO (s)

Given: 12 moles O₂

<u>Step 2: Stoichiometry</u>

<u />12 \ mol \ O_2(\frac{2 \ mol \ Cu}{1 \ mol \ O_2} ) = 24 mol Cu

<u>Step 3: Check</u>

<em>We are given 2 sig figs.</em>

Our final answer is in 2 sig figs, so no need to round.

3 0
3 years ago
How much work is required to pull a sled if you use 60J of work in 5 seconds?
Natali [406]

Answer:

DO I Look Like santa too you how am i supposed to know How about this how about you goo.gle the answer wow smart

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Would all the different kinds of organisms in a forest be considered population or a community?
anzhelika [568]
All of the different kinds of organisms in a forest would be considered a community.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is 13.48 cm + 7.6 cm, rounded to the correct number of<br> significant figures?
    15·1 answer
  • Which cell structure most resembles the human nervous system?
    15·2 answers
  • 3. Under certain conditions, oxygen gas (O2) has a density of 0.00134 g/mL. Find the volume occupied by 250.0 g of O2 under the
    5·2 answers
  • 1. How do you determine how many protons are in a neutral element?
    14·1 answer
  • How many grams of NaOH are<br> needed to make 400. mL of<br> 1.50 M solution?
    6·1 answer
  • The person who follows me first will be marked branliset and will be followed by me​
    6·2 answers
  • 22 °C to K (approximate room temperature)
    11·1 answer
  • 2. The volume of a rock is 5 cm' and its mass is 50 g. Find the density.<br> pls help :)
    7·1 answer
  • Explain radiation zone and convection zone.
    9·1 answer
  • What is the difference between ethanol and methanol.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!