1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
I am Lyosha [343]
3 years ago
10

Why is it important to choose a relevant scale for analyzing data sets in science?

Chemistry
1 answer:
alexdok [17]3 years ago
3 0
<h3>Explanation;</h3>

<h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."</h2><h2 /><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.</h2><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.If the data is related to areas where we did not have a whole lot of existing data - space, weather or even all the new fitness trackers we all wear these days.</h2><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.If the data is related to areas where we did not have a whole lot of existing data - space, weather or even all the new fitness trackers we all wear these days.The fitness tracker data wasnt available a few years back, so more data is probably going to change the data, especially once the adoption moves from the early adopters (tech and fitness geeks) to other people - old people. kids etc - bet there is not much data related to them.</h2><h2 /><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.If the data is related to areas where we did not have a whole lot of existing data - space, weather or even all the new fitness trackers we all wear these days.The fitness tracker data wasnt available a few years back, so more data is probably going to change the data, especially once the adoption moves from the early adopters (tech and fitness geeks) to other people - old people. kids etc - bet there is not much data related to them.Without knowing what type of data, the amount and quality of existing data, it is hard to generalize.</h2>

<h2><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Confirm</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em></h2><h2><em><u>#Brainliest</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Answer</u></em></h2>
You might be interested in
How fast an object is moving is its A) direction. B) motion. C) position. D) speed.
tamaranim1 [39]
D.) speed will be the answer
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. the smallest complete unit of a compound or diatomic gas shell
kogti [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

1. The smallest complete unit of a compound or diatomic gas

ATOM

Atoms are small tiny particles that makes up a molecule. It is regarded as the smallest indivisible particle that parts in a chemical reaction.

2. A new substance formed by the combination of two or more different atoms

COMPOUNDS

Compounds are substances composed of two or more kinds of atoms. Their properties differs from those of the constituent elements that combines to make them up.

3. Path of electrons around an atomic nucleus

SHELL

The shell describes the path of an electron round a nucleus

4. A substance consisting of only one type of atom

MONOATOMIC MOLECULE

It is an aggregate of one type of atom.

5 0
4 years ago
Plutonium-236 is an alpha emitter with a half-life of 2.86 years. If a
Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

because its half life is shorter than the subsequent ones

7 0
3 years ago
7.The _____ theory of matter states that all particles of matter are in constant motion.
SashulF [63]
The kinetic energy theory of matter states that all particles of matter are in constant motion.
Kinetics has to do with some kind of movement, which is why this answer is the only plausible one. 
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the two forces that battle within a star ?
Kay [80]

Gravity and Thermal pressure

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The eggs all have to be the same, making them the . The different drinks used are the
    9·1 answer
  • Who is it the scientific
    7·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP WITH THESE QUICK// WILL AWARD BRANLIEST
    13·1 answer
  • Please help!<br>If it's right I'll give you extra points for it.
    12·1 answer
  • What are some physical characteristics of matter? A) Gas bubbles, odor B) heat and light C) solubility, thermal conductivity
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a source of organic matter in soil farmyard manure compost​
    7·1 answer
  • Whhat are the maximum number of molecules present in 10g of O2 gas at STP?
    11·1 answer
  • Name the complex ion [al(cn)6]3−. the oxidation number of aluminum is +3.
    6·2 answers
  • Geologic evidence shows that Earth's tectonic plates can move thousands of kilometers across the Earth's surface. These movement
    9·2 answers
  • Your friend claims that weather predictions are just guesses. What would you say to change your friend's mind? Include at least
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!