<h3>
Answer: choice B) counterclockwise rotation of 90 degrees around the origin</h3>
To go from figure Q to figure Q', we rotate one of two ways
* 270 degrees clockwise
* 90 degrees counterclockwise
Since "270 clockwise" isn't listed, this means "90 counterclockwise" is the only possibility.
Y = -3/4x + 6
you write in the y=mx+c form!
m= the slope
c = the y-intercept. (it is the second number of the coordinates)
Lets calculate how much she walks each weeks and then we multiply that by the number of weeks.
weekWalk = 5(2) + 3 = 10 + 3 = 13
therefore, she walks 13 miles per week, if she walked for 29 weeks then we have:
total walked =(29)(13) = 377
so she walked 377 miles total, so her original estimate is not reasonable
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
First simplify the equation.
Now multiply both sides by 3.
I hope it helps you. Please choose my answer as the BRAINLIEST.
9514 1404 393
Explanation:
Here's one way to go at it.
Draw segments AB and CO. Define angles as follows. (The triangles with sides that are radii are all isosceles, so their base angles are congruent.)
x = angle OAB = angle OBA
y = angle OAC = angle OCA
z = angle OBC = angle OCB
Consider the angles at each of the points A, B, C.
At A, we have ...
angle CAB = x + y
At B, we have ...
angle CBA = x + z
At C, we have ...
angle ACB = y + z
The sum of the angles of triangle ABC is 180°, as is the sum of angles in triangle ABO. This gives ...
x + x + ∠AOB = (x+y) +(x+z) +(y+z)
∠AOB = 2(y+z) = 2∠ACB
This shows ∠AOB = 2×∠C, as required.
