The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Existentialism, anti-colonialism, and the quest for personal freedom influenced the landmarks of the last fifty years in that they were the dominant concepts that supported Neoliberalism, as the imperative economic system in modern western societies.
During these last fifty years, those concepts shaped the thinking of corporate America. An economic and political system that promoted free market, where corporations became so rich, countries signed free trade agreements, multinational companies opened branches in many third world companies, and unfortunately, it never impacted in a positive way to the working class, just benefited the rich people.
That is why today we see so many protests and demonstration in many countries, including the US, where people are demanding drastic changes after the US Crisis of 2008, when the federal government decided to support and rescue the big bankers and corporations, instead of supporting the interests of the common American citizen.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
Reckless driving such as speeding way over the limit would be handled by the criminal court and not traffic court.
The correct answer would be, death is a terrifying topic that even adults can't discuss.
Abigail who has heard adults talking about the death, senses that her mother is avoiding the topic and has come to the conclusion that death is a terrifying topic that even adults can't discuss.
Explanation:
People usually avoid discussing topics like deaths in front of children. This is because incidents like deaths leave deep footprints on the mind of children and they might get horrified due to the discussion upon this topic, so parents usually avoid discussing deaths.
The same did Abigail's parents. They did not tell him clearly that his grandfather is dead, rather they told him that his grandfather is no more, while leaving house for the funeral and leaving him home with the babysitter. So Abigail concluded that death is such a terrifying topic that even adults can't discuss it.
Learn more about dealing children at:
brainly.com/question/983943
#LearnWithBrainly
King george, queen whatever, and the spanish dictators, and the tsar
