1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksju [112]
3 years ago
5

Provide two criticisms of the Bush Policy in War in Iraq.

Social Studies
1 answer:
FromTheMoon [43]3 years ago
7 0
1. The war should  never happened in the first place because Bush had no concrete evidence on whether the Iraqi government possesed weapons of mass destruction
2. Bush administration should've understood the blowback of the war expenses towards United States' economy
You might be interested in
What was president Kennedy's legislative agenda known as?
Julli [10]
It was called the New Frontier
6 0
3 years ago
NEED HELP FAST! 
Maksim231197 [3]
Place ppl in public 
homie
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
based on what happens in julius caesar which statement best describes the effect of caesar refusing to take the crown?
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

There are differing responses to this question, depending on which character provides the answer. Casca explains to Brutus and Cassius that, in the arena, Caesar refused the crown every time Antony offered it because each time he refused, the crowd responded uproariously. Casca observes that “he would fain have had it,” implying that Caesar’s refusal was, essentially, theater and that he was simply pandering to the crowd. On the other hand, Antony uses the same incident to reveal that Caesar refused the crown because he was not ambitious or power-hungry. However, it’s more likely that Caesar’s motivations were as Casca implies: Caesar theatrically refused the crown to further secure the hearts and minds of the people, and he fully intended to accept the crown when the senate officially offered it to him.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
A(n) __________ is a competition between nations to develop and produce new weapons and outmatch one another's war capabilities.
zubka84 [21]
The answer is "arms race".

An arms race, in its unique use, refers to a competition between at least two states to have the best military. The developing threat of the nuclear-arms race has neglected to rouse much verbal confrontation. Atomic arrangement is never again broadly examined in the media; the general population has been enlightened small regarding a subject of existential significance; and inquiries once energetically contended have been to a great extent overlooked.
3 0
3 years ago
What happened during the Glorious Revolution?
Scilla [17]

Answer:

C. James II was peacefully overthrown by the English people

Explanation:

It was named the Glorious Revolution because the people had just experienced a huge civil war in order to drive off the king, but when they overthrew the king this time, there was no bloodshed.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • José is depressed. His therapist told him that reading a book each month would help. He should also visit friends, go bowling, d
    15·1 answer
  • How did the rural electrification administration impact georgia?
    12·2 answers
  • Which act is a conventional form of political participation?
    8·2 answers
  • What is southeast China climate
    11·1 answer
  • The practice of sending e-mail messages to people who request information on a particular topic or about a specific product is c
    11·1 answer
  • What steps must the police follow to search someone or someone’s property??
    5·2 answers
  • What is the first day of lent called
    10·1 answer
  • |
    14·1 answer
  • The discipline that examines, interprets, and analyzes the results of ethnography is called
    5·1 answer
  • What do you understand by environment?​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!