Answer:
Renaming Campaigns
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the factor that wouldn't change this would be Renaming Campaigns. This is because an account's optimization score is an estimate of how well the account/campaign will perform in the near future. Changing the name will not change this score since the campaign is still following the same strategy and therefore the estimates will be the same.
Answer:
Options Include:
<em>A) Server-side validation
</em>
<em>B) Client-side validation
</em>
<em>C) Validate in trust
</em>
D) Client-side and server-side validation
<em>Client-side and server-side validation is Correct</em>
Explanation:
The best option is to validate the client side with the server side. Using these together would provide the best testing option for Sharon.
<em>This keeps user feedback instantly without wasting postbacks while also protecting against JavaScript disabled users. That's how the validation controls for ASP.NET operate. </em>
This is definitely not over-engineering as there are risks of using one without the other.
Individual validation on the server side and individual validation on the client side are both incorrect. Trust validation is not a form of validation.
Answer:
RANK.AVG
Explanation:
Required
Arrange data in descending order based on average
The feature to do this is to use the RANK.AVG() function.
By default, the function will return the ranks of the selected data in descending order (i.e. from highest to lowest); though, the sort order can be changed to ascending order.
The syntax is:
=RANK.AVG (number, ref, [order])
Where
number 
The number to use as rank
ref The cell range
order 0 represents descending order while 1 represents ascending order
