A person who will get alienation must have done something horribly wrong to get this.
a person who will get job dissatisfaction must have most likely not completed the job or done the job wrong.
there's a difference but a minor one.
someone did something really bad to get alienated.
someone did something still bad but could be fixed and is acceptable to some measures. (more like a warning)
Clinicians can utilise a systematic interviewing strategy described in the manual to arrive at a diagnosis for DSM. They respond to questions that are posed objectively about the person's perceptible behaviours on five different levels, or axes.
The classification has a satisfactory level of reliability. In collaboration with the International Classification of Diseases, DSM diagnoses are created (ICD). Diagnostic labels, according to DSM-IV detractors, can stigmatise a person by skewing how others interpret and perceive their past and present activities as well as how they are perceived by others. The advantages of diagnostic labels are that they facilitate communication between mental health practitioners regarding treatment and therapy and that they create a common language for thought-sharing among researchers looking into the causes and therapies of diseases.
Learn more about DSM here:
brainly.com/question/29440663
#SPJ4
Just stay determined and don't give up! Hope this helps!
Answer:
Explanation:
its eazy USE ur brain for this dont use brAINLY U can use ur head its called taking notes i make 100 every day some 90s
Research on <u>"the fundamental attribution error" </u>suggests it is <u>"common"</u> for people to assume that dispositions are the underlying causes of most behaviors.
The fundamental attribution error is our tendency to clarify somebody's conduct in light of inward factors, for example, identity or air, and to think little of the impact that outside variables, for example, situational impacts, have on someone else's conduct. We may, for instance, clarify the way that somebody is jobless in view of his character, and point the finger at him for his predicament, when in certainty he was as of late laid off because of a lazy economy. Obviously, there are times when we're right about our suspicions, however the key attribution blunder is our inclination to clarify the conduct of others in light of character or air. This is especially obvious when the conduct is negative.
