Before ordering this magical pill she must use her critical thinking skills of analysis, interpretation, and reflection. She needs to analyze whether such statements that are advertised are true or not; after analyzing she interprets what she can and cannot possibly do to resolve her dilemma; and then she would reflect whether such product is a practical way of spending her own money or not.
Answer:
One example would be fans of the same team, such as the Patriots. Patriot fans have a collective identity of rooting for and supporting that team.
With the imperialistic politics United States became one of the economically most advanced countries.
Explanation:
- By 1880, Americans were building a continental empire of settlers.
- The next move was to create an overseas empire, or so young patricians like Theodore Roosevelt and his mentor Henry Cabot Lodge believed.
- When United States started spreading their Empire, the country became one of the most advanced industrial powers.
- Its economical rise was unstoppable.
Answer:
un ethical system or judicial system depends on what they want you to say
Answer: True
=================================================
Explanation:
The first amendment prohibits congress from making any law to prohibit free speech, so that means the federal government isn't allowed to restrict speech. However, there are exceptions such as speech to cause a riot, insurrection, obscenities on public airwaves, etc. all of which are not allowed.
In contrast, a private company like Twitter has the choice whether or not to allow or ban a certain post. The first amendment of the constitution does not apply to companies such as this one. On one hand, you could argue that such restriction is a bad thing because it limits speech; but you could also argue that if the government forced companies like Twitter to do a certain action, then it restricts their freedom.
For privately owned social media companies, their platform is something they solely own 100%, meaning that the government does not own or control what goes on that platform. So this is another viewpoint as to why the first amendment doesn't apply to these companies.
In a slight bit of confusing terminology, a private company can be publicly owned. This means that the government doesn't control the company, but rather it's traded on the stock market. Those who own stock in the company are part owners of it. You would have to use the phrasing "government owned and government run" to indicate that the government has full control of such a platform.