Answer:
I would say B.
Explanation:
A would only fix biodiversity temporarily, until humans come and wipe them out again. C is just kind of impossible, and containing them could also be problematic. D is also unreasonable, and some animals would not be able to thrive in new ecosystems. B would help save the environment, which would save the animals, which would help biodiversity.
Answer:
chemicals that cross the synaptic gap and bind to receptors on another neuron
found only in the central nervous system (the brain and spinal cord)
Explanation:
Neurotransmitters are defined as the chemicals that is transported from a nerve cell across the synaptic gap to the receptor of another neuron or a target cell such as a gland cell or a muscle cell.
Neurotransmitters are generated in the central nervous system (the brain and spinal cord) and are stored in synaptic vesicles.
"Hence, the correct answer is:
chemicals that cross the synaptic gap and bind to receptors on another neuron
found only in the central nervous system (the brain and spinal cord)".
Answer:
An introduced species, alien species, exotic species, adventive species, immigrant species, ... Non-native species can have various effects on the local ecosystem. ... Some species have been introduced intentionally to combat pests
Explanation:
Darwin's finches are a gathering of around fifteen types of passerine winged animals. They are outstanding for their exceptional decent variety in nose frame and capacity. They are regularly named the subfamily Geospizinae or tribe Geospizini.
After an immense dry spell, the greater hooked finches lived and the littler ones passed on. So two years after the fact finches har mouths that were somewhat greater.
A lot of the energy from photosynthesis flows out as heat.
^answer
When energy is being transported or flowed through the ecosystem most of the heat is lost.
Hope this helps!
