set up an equation for the perimeter
l = length w = width
2l + 2w = 64
set up another equation as you know the length is 3 times the width
w = 3l
subsitute w = 3l into the 2l + 2w = 64
2l + 2(3l) = 64
solve for l
2l + 6l = 64
8l = 64
<em><u>length</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>=</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>8</u></em>
subsitute into w = 3l
w = 3(8)
<em><u>width</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>=</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>2</u></em><em><u>4</u></em>
Answer:
Yes there is sufficient evidence to reject the company's evidence
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The sample size is n = 25
The mean is
The standard deviation is 
The z-score is z = -1.94
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Generally the p-value is mathematically evaluated as

From the z table the area under the normal curve to the left corresponding to -1.94 is

=> 
=> 
Let assume the level of significance is 
Hence the
this mean that
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is sufficient evidence to reject the company's evidence
Answer=B
The explanatory variable is another term for the independent variable. The independent variable is the 'thing' that YOU decide to change/manipulate in an experiment. The type of nail polish given was the independent variable for this experiment.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
A:y=3x+4
You would place a #line going from negatives on left to positive on right then place a point at positive 5 and go back 5, 3 times