You are a criminologist and or a forensic scientist.
<span>This was the case of "Holt v. Hobbs". In this case, Holt, a practicing Salafi Muslim, claimed that the imposition of facial hair restrictions were an imposition based upon the Religious Land Use and Imprisoned Persons Act. The 9-0 majority found that the prison had not exhausted all available measures for accommodating Mr. Holt and that the grooming policy was an imposition against his religious needs.</span>
Answer:
Actually, it's A, B, C, and E
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Have a great day! :)
Witch statement is true for what
