1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bezzdna [24]
3 years ago
9

Give an example of something that has bilateral symmetry

Social Studies
1 answer:
kherson [118]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

eye , arm , leg

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Firms often have the option to reduce the scale of operations at some point in the future, which is known as a(n):______
lisabon 2012 [21]

Firms often have the option to reduce the scale of operations at some point in the future, which is known as an abandonment option.

An investment contract's abandonment option is a provision that gives parties the opportunity to end the agreement before it matures.

It offers value by allowing the parties to cancel the commitment if circumstances change and the investment becomes unprofitable.

The ability of management to determine whether or not to finish that project is actually what is meant by an abandonment option.

One of the four different real options (options on tangible assets) that can be added to investment projects like gold mines, airplanes, cargo ships, heavy equipment, and so forth is an abandonment option.

In bilateral agreements without a predetermined expiration date, abandonment options are frequently employed.

Learn  more about abandonment here

brainly.com/question/10720563?

#SPJ4

7 0
1 year ago
Which action is protected by the first amendment?
andrezito [222]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
The middle class in ancient Egyptian society was made up of ____________
dexar [7]

Answer:The middle class in ancient Egyptian society was made up of <u>merchants,manufacturesrand artisans.</u>

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs
kenny6666 [7]

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


7 0
3 years ago
When running through the airport, collin trips and spills all of his stuff out of his backpack. lots of people see collin trip a
Ghella [55]
The case is best explained by bystander apathy or also known as the bystander effect. It happens when the nearness of others demoralizes a person from mediating in a crisis circumstance. The term onlooker impact alludes to the marvel in which the more noteworthy the quantity of individuals display, the more improbable individuals are to help a man in trouble.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • QUESTION 6
    13·1 answer
  • How does agriculture foster the development of civilization?
    7·1 answer
  • Sexual intimacy is the major reason for the existence of all relationships.
    9·1 answer
  • Please help answer number 5!
    9·1 answer
  • Standing on the commuter train platform, you glance down the tracks to see if the train is coming. As you do, you notice that th
    9·1 answer
  • Parliament first limited the power of the crown under the
    15·1 answer
  • Match gross domestic product (GDP) with the situation in Africa:
    7·2 answers
  • Of the 48 representatives attending the convention in 1849, how many were Californios?
    13·2 answers
  • Which behavior would the nurse demonstrate when caring for culturally diverse patients? select all that apply. one, some, or all
    10·1 answer
  • How much of a lecture's main content do students normally record in their notes?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!