Answer:
true, i think
Explanation:
In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.
Answer:
conduct that breaks a law where a crinimal penalty
Explanation:
Criminal conduct means conduct that breaks a law where a criminal penalty can apply. Sometimes a certain action (or failure to act) can be both a crime and trigger rights to civil damages or compensation as well.
Answer:
the three are residential, commercial, and industrial.
Explanation:
Answer:
19. Paula’s boyfriend moved to her hometown, Oklahoma City, from Houston, Texas. Two weeks after he arrived, he asked her to phone his bank in Houston and inquire about his balance. She did so as a favor to him and found out the balance was more than $40,000. As soon as she told him, he left and drove to Houston to remove it from his account. In Houston, he was arrested by the FBI for fraud and several related crimes. Paula was then charged with the federal crime of making a phone call across state lines for the furtherance of a fraudulent scheme. Her boyfriend only knew the scheme had been successful by Paula’s report of the large balance in his old account. What would be a possible defense for Paula?
Explanation:
