For the year ended December 31, 2018, the warranty-related entry would include a debit to warranty expense of $80,000.
If it's miles impracticable to determine the cumulative impact of applying a trade-in accounting principle, then the new accounting principle should be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. in this situation, the disclosures discussed in FSP 30.4.
Cumulative effect equals the difference between the actual retained profits suggested at the beginning of the yr using the antique approach and the retained income that would have been reported at the start of the year if the brand-new technique had been utilized in earlier years.
Learn more about warranty here brainly.com/question/14227081
#SPJ4
Answer:
He should attend classes at the local college to receive training in management.
Explanation:
Best option.
Answer:
Corinne Company
Investing Activities Section of the Statement of Cash Flows:
Equipment sales $12
Equipment bought ($58)
Net cash used ($46)
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Balance Sheet of Corinne company at the end of 2025 and 2024:
2025 2024
Cash $50 $70
Accounts receivable (net) 320 270
Buildings and equipment 200 150
Accumulated depreciation
- buildings and equipment (36) (16)
Land 180 80
Totals $714 $554
Accounts payable $180 $146
Notes payable- bank long term 0 80
Mortgage payable 60 0
Common stock, $10 par 418 318
Retained earnings 56 10
Totals $714 $554
b) other information:
Land and Common Stock exchange
Equipment sold for $12 (cost $10 and book value $8)
Cash dividends $20
c) Equipment account
Beginning balance 150
Equipment sold -8
Balance 142
Closing balance 200
Purchase of new 58 (200 - 142)
Law of diminishing return has a positive relationship with marginal cost
Explanation:
The law of diminishing returns implies that marginal cost will rise as output increases. Eventually, rising marginal cost will lead to a rise in average total cost.
Answer:
Please check the info below
Explanation:
1. For Osaka
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 792000 / $9900000 *100
= 8.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 9900000 / $ 2475000 * 100
= 4.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 8% *4 %
= 32.00%
Hence the correct answer is 32.00%
For Yokohama :
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 2900000 / $ 29000000*100
= 10.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 29000000 / $ 14500000* 100
= 2.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 10% *2 %
= 20.00%
Hence the correct answer is 20.00%
2. The correct answer is
Osaka = $ 371,250
Yokohama = $ 435,000
3. The correct answer is No
This is because since Osaka has a higher ROI, Yokohama’s greater amount of residual income is not an indication that it is better managed
