Answer:
C
Explanation:
They are all true to one degree or another except D. The worst of them is contained
<em>in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.</em>
<em />
In other words, the worst crime of all was the fact that the British Government had established George III as an undemocratic unapproachable Lord and Master over the colonies, and the Declaration liked that least of all.
<span>I believe the answer is: Mr. Jones had signed an authorization to disclose the information for the test results and the result should be given to the health department.
By making this authorization, Mr. Jones has given Dr. Marks with the right to handle the information regarding his personal test as long as its within the scope of health department database. This would take out all the legal grounds that Jones could use to sue Dr. Marks.</span>
<u>The consequences of life tenure for federal judges:</u>
- Life tenure for federal judges was implemented for an extraordinarily vital purpose.
- It protects the judges from the 'political stress' which might come with periodic liability to an 'electorate'.
- But importantly, this ideal does not demand life tenure. Appointment without possibility of renewal for a fixed term of years would fulfill the same purpose.
- But ironically this life tenure has further magnified political divisions.
- So, this has failed to completely implement the judicial independence that the lifetime appointment of a federal judge had hoped to serve.
Answer:
1
Explanation:
because I think that no 1 is much more important
