1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
wariber [46]
3 years ago
12

Proves that the sum of 5 consecutive natural numbers is divisible by 5 ​

Mathematics
2 answers:
erastova [34]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

n = 5m + 10 = 5(m + 2), since m + 2 is an integer, then the n is divisible by 5.

Step-by-step explanation:

borishaifa [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Natural numbers are simply positive integers.  For now, refer to the middle number (the third number), as x.  Thus, the numbers are: x - 2, x - 1, x, x + 1, and x + 2.  Simply add all these numbers to get 5x, a number that is divisible by 5.  As such, you can conclude that any 5 consecutive numbers are divisible by 5, and the quotient would be the third, or middle number.

Hope it helps :) and let me know if you want me to elaborate.

You might be interested in
What is the constant of proportionality in the equation y=2/3x
Alexandra [31]
2/3x no y intercept


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is equivalent to (5)^7/3
kifflom [539]
<em>The answer is \sqrt[3]{ 5^{7} }</em>

The reason we get this answer is because when you are converting from exponential form, to radical form you always place the numerator as our constant's exponent in the radical <em>( 5^{7} is called the radicand because it is located in the radical)</em> and the denominator in front of the radical, where it would be called the index. 

<em>Here's what a formula would look like:</em> ( \sqrt[n]{x} ) ^{q}=x^{ \frac{p}{q} }

Thank you for your question! I hope this helped! Have an amazing day and feel free to let me know if I can help you further! :D
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help I'm desperate...
Evgen [1.6K]
Ok here’s the answer! I again had to crop out the first step. here it was to divide equation 1 by 3 and add that to equation 2. all you need do you show that step is to write equation 1: -3x+2y=8 and equation 2: (11y/3)=35/3

6 0
3 years ago
SHOW ALL WORK BUT KEE IT SIMPLE AND EASY TO UNDERSTAND:)
7nadin3 [17]
To do this problem, you need to use a process called completing the square. Let me explain:  

To complete the square on the function f(x) = x² + 8x +13, first group the first two terms in (  )  and leave some space at the end as follows:
f(x) = (x² + 8x          ) + 13  Now our next step is to fill in the space and adjust our expression on the right hand side of the function.  To do this, we take half of the middle number 8 and then square it:  so 4² = 16 and we fill in our space inside the ( ) with this value 16;   
f(x) = (x² + 8x + 16) + 13  now what we have done is to increase the overall value of our expression on the right by 16, but we want the overall value to remain the same.  To fix this we simply need to subtract 16 at the end like this:  f(x) = (x² + 8x + 16) + 13 -16   we can simplify and get the following.
f(x) = (x² + 8x + 16) - 3   At this point we're almost done.. All we need to do now is to rewrite the what is in the parentheses in a slightly different form.  Here is what it will look like:  f(x) = (x + 4)² - 3  notice all I did was take the sum of the square root of x² and the square root of 16 originally in the (  ) to get then new expression inside the ( ) and then square that  ( )²

Now this is a nice form to have because you can get the vertex straight from this form.. IN FACT this is called vertex form or (h,k) form for short.  In general the form is f(x) = a(x - h)² + k  don't worry about the 'a'  for now.. you might see that in our case it is just 1 and will not effect our equation.  You only have to consider this if the original leading coefficient of the quadratic is not 1 to begin with...

So you can see that our vertex is (-4,-3)  
Hope this is helpful, but if you have questions let me know.
5 0
3 years ago
3(2c-8) - 10c &gt; 0 can some one explain how to solve this ?​
Jet001 [13]

Answer:

c < - 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

3(2c - 8) - 10c > 0 ← distribute and simplify left side

6c - 24 - 10c > 0

- 4c - 24 > 0 ( add 24 to both sides )

- 4c > 24

Divide both sides by - 4, reversing the inequality symbol as a consequence of dividing by a negative quantity.

c < - 6

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Stacy rolls a pair of six-sided fair dice.
    9·1 answer
  • Large samples of women and men are obtained and the hemoglobin level is measured in each subject. Here is the 95% confidence int
    9·1 answer
  • × + 20 + 2× = 10 - 2× - 15
    7·1 answer
  • A stadium seats 107,282 people. Another one seats 71,706 people. How many more does the 1st stadium seat than the 2nd one?
    12·2 answers
  • 2 x + 5 = 10<br><br> what is x =?
    12·2 answers
  • Plz help ya' girl out <br> Giving brainiest
    7·1 answer
  • Please answer this will give brainliest
    7·1 answer
  • What is the solution to the equation 7(a – 10) = 13 – 2(2a + 3)?
    12·2 answers
  • Between which two numbers will you find 5.634 x 10^2? A. 0.0562 and 0.0563B. 0.0563 and 0.0564C. 562 and 563D. 563 and 564
    7·2 answers
  • Pls help me asap stuck on this
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!