Answer:
d. loss of positive social rewards
Explanation:
Behavioral psychology or Behaviorism is the theory of learning that is based on this idea that all behaviors are obtained through conditioning. And conditioning occurs when an individual interact with the environment.
When a person retires and starts to develop health problems, the person eventually loses contact with the society and starts to get depressed because he loses the positive social rewards.
When one interacts with the society, it provides a sense of well being and self dignity that results in happiness and contend. The individual beliefs that he or she is being accepted by the society.
Thus when becomes unsocial, he enters into a state of depression.
Thus the answer is --
d. loss of positive social rewards
It is called an atlas.
Have a nice day :)
Answer:
A developing country (or a low and middle-income country (LMIC), less developed country, less economically developed country (LEDC), medium-industrialized country or underdeveloped country) is a country with a less developed industrial base and a low Human Development Index (HDI) relative to other countries.
Humanistic psychologists suggest that people are consciously motivated to reach their maximum potential; that is, people have a fundamental drive toward actualization.
<h3>Who are humanistic psychologists?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the fact that human's are unique beings that have to treated specially as humans.
These people are of the opinion that people have to be treated with the rights that they deserve.
These psychologists have the belief that people are not entirely the product of the areas that they find themselves. They believe that the behaviorists study people as organisms. This is something they are against.
Read more on humanistic psychologists here: brainly.com/question/9494586
#SPJ1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
