The answer is INCOME TAXES. It is not sales tax. Just took the quiz on OW and got it right.
Answer:
a. $1,765,000
Explanation:
Total stockholder’s equity on December 31, 2013 = Total equity at end 2012 – amount paid for 3,000 shares were reacquired at $28 per share – amount paid for 3,000 shares were reacquired at $35 per share + amount collect from 1,800 shares of treasury stock were sold at $30 per share + net income of $450,000
= $1,450,000 – 3,000 * $28 – 3,000 * $35 + 1,8000 *$30 + $450,000 = $1,765,000
Answer:
false
Explanation:
thanks to expanded communications and the relaxation of many legal barriers, investors can buy securities from companies anywhere in the world.
Answer:
13%
Explanation:
As per the situation the solution of required rate of return first we need to find out the beta which is shown below:-
Expected rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return)
11% = 7% + Beta × 6%
Beta = 1
now If the market risk premium increased to 6% so,
The required rate of return = 7% + 1 × 6%
= 13%
Therefore for computing the required rate of return we simply applied the above formula.
Answer:
Who is the franchisor? McDonald's
Who is the franchisee? C.B. Management Inc.
In a franchise relationship, the <u>franchisee</u> is economically dependent on the <u>franchisor's</u> business system.
The franchise relationship is defined by the <u>contract</u>.
Did C.B. Management, Inc.’s failure to make a payment due more than thirty days earlier constitute a breach of the franchise contract? YES
Why? A) the contract provided McDonald's could terminate the contract when a payment was more than 30 days late.
Did the contract provide that the acceptance of a late payment waived McDonald's right to terminate for late payments? NO
What does an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing require? That the parties act <u>reasonably</u>.
Did McDonald's act of accepting late payments in the past transform McDonald's right to terminate into a discretionary decision governed by the standard of good faith and fair dealing in the future? NO
Why? Which one of these reasons is not correct? B) the actions of the parties control this issue.
A court would likely find for <u>McDonald’s</u>
