Answer:
0 has no multiplicative inverse :)
Step-by-step explanation: Hope this helps
It will land on its side 24/60. If we simplify this we get 2/5
This question is not complete
Complete Question
Sherry claims that the expression 1/x will always be equivalent to a repeating decimal whenever x is an odd number greater than 1.
Which of these values of x will prove Sherry's claim is false?
Answer:
When x = 5
Step-by-step explanation:
Sherry claims that the expression 1/x will always be equivalent to a repeating decimal whenever x is an odd number greater than 1.
Examples of odd numbers greater than 1 : 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 ....
We would put these odd numbers to test
a) When x = 3
= 1/3 = 0.3333333333
b) When x = 5
= 1/5 = 0.2
c) When x = 7
= 1/7 = 0.142857142
d) When x = 9
= 1/9 = 0.1111111111
e) When x = 11
= 1/11 = 0.0909090909
From the above calculation, we can see that the only odd number greater than 1 that will prove Sherry's theory wrong is when x = 5
Therefore, the value of x that will prove Sherry's claim is false is when x = 5
Well, I assume that both tickets cost the same: let's call it x.
So the tickets cost 106%x (the cost of the ticket plus tax).
The total prize of the tickets will be: 2*106% x+20.
But let's assume that you share it half-half: then each of you pays half of this:
So, this is how much each of you pays: 1.06x+10
