The size of the force varies inversely as the square of the distance between the two charges. Therefore, if the distance between the two charges is doubled, the attraction or repulsion becomes weaker, decreasing to one-fourth of the original value
Answer:
a) 39.6 m/s b) 4123 N
Explanation:
a) At the top of the loop, all of the forces point downwards (force of gravity and normal force).
Fnet=ma
ma=m(v^2/R) (centripetal acceleration)
mg=m(v^2/R)
m cancels out (this is why pilot feels weightless) so,
g=(v^2/R)
9.8 m/s^2 = v^2/160 m
v^2=1568 m^2/s^2
v=39.6 m/s
b) At the bottom of the loop, the normal force and the force of gravity point in opposite directions. The normal force is the weight felt.
Convert 300 km/hr to m/s
300 km/hr=83.3 m/s
Convert pilot's weight into mass:
760 N = 77.55 kg
Fnet=ma
n-mg=m(v^2/R)
n=(77.55 kg)(((83.3 m/s)^2)/160 m)+(77.55 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)
n=3363.2 N+760 N=4123 N
Answer is d)
...................
Answer:
The asteroid's acceleration at this point is 
Explanation:
The equation that governs the trajectory of asteroid is given by :
The velocity of asteroid is given by :
At some point during the trip across the screen, the asteroid is at rest. It means, v = 0
So,
Acceleration,
Put t = 0.971 s
So, the asteroid's acceleration at this point is and it is decelerating.
Answer:
The paper focuses on the biology of stress and resilience and their biomarkers in humans from the system science perspective. A stressor pushes the physiological system away from its baseline state toward a lower utility state. The physiological system may return toward the original state in one attractor basin but may be shifted to a state in another, lower utility attractor basin. While some physiological changes induced by stressors may benefit health, there is often a chronic wear and tear cost due to implementing changes to enable the return of the system to its baseline state and maintain itself in the high utility baseline attractor basin following repeated perturbations. This cost, also called allostatic load, is the utility reduction associated with both a change in state and with alterations in the attractor basin that affect system responses following future perturbations. This added cost can increase the time course of the return to baseline or the likelihood of moving into a different attractor basin following a perturbation. Opposite to this is the system's resilience which influences its ability to return to the high utility attractor basin following a perturbation by increasing the likelihood and/or speed of returning to the baseline state following a stressor. This review paper is a qualitative systematic review; it covers areas most relevant for moving the stress and resilience field forward from a more quantitative and neuroscientific perspective.
Explanation:
