The answer is "chart junk".
Chartjunk alludes to every single visual component in outlines, charts and diagrams that are not important to grasp the data given on the chart, or that divert the viewer from this data. Cases or examples of unnecessary components which may be called chartjunk incorporate substantial or dull network lines, ornamented outline axes and show edges, pictures or symbols inside information diagrams, and fancy shading.
According to her own survey the 135 who fear public speaking are way less than 40%. In her case its actually close to 30%.
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
I think the answer is C. Not positive though
Answer:
avoid
settlor/grantor/trustor
reduce
Trust
Explanation:
Trusts are used to transfer assets from an estate. The contractual nature of a trust ____avoid_________ probating its assets upon the death of settlor/trustor/grantor___________ the and may __reduce________ federal estate tax. An attorney who practices _____Trust_______ law should be hired to draft the trust in order to ensure that all of the benefits of establishing a trust are realized.