I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
The time constant determines how long it takes for the capacitor to charge.
To find the answer, we have to know more about the time constant of the capacitor.
<h3>What is time constant?</h3>
- The time it takes for a capacitor to discharge 36.8% of its charge in a discharging circuit or charge up to 63.2% of its maximum capacity in a charging circuit, given that it has no initial charge, is the time constant of a resistor-capacitor series combination.
- The circuit's reaction to a step-up (or constant) voltage input is likewise determined by the time constant.
- As a result, the time constant determines the circuit's cutoff frequency.
Thus, we can conclude that, the time constant determines how long it takes for the capacitor to charge.
Learn more about the time constant here:
brainly.com/question/17050299
#SPJ4
Answer:
sun is the main source while the other object reflect light on the sun
Explanation:
nasa libro yans
The increase in the average kinetic energy of the ball causes the increase in the temperature of the ball.
Kinetic energy of a particle is directly proportional to its temperature.
A ball initially at rest acquires kinetic energy when an external force is applied to it. As the person strikes the ball with a bat, the ball gains momentum which increases its kinetic energy of the ball.
Temperature on the other hand, is the measure of the average kinetic energy of a particle. Consequently, as the kinetic energy of the ball increases, the temperature of the ball increases as well.
Thus, we can conclude that the increase in the average kinetic energy of the ball causes the increase in the temperature of the ball.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/18833622
